首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth: JGR >Assessment of the capabilities of the temporal and spatiotemporal ICAmethod for geophysical signal separation in GRACE data
【24h】

Assessment of the capabilities of the temporal and spatiotemporal ICAmethod for geophysical signal separation in GRACE data

机译:评估时空时空ICA方法在GRACE数据中进行地球物理信号分离的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We investigate the potential of two independent component analysis (ICA) methods, i.e., the temporal and spatiotemporal ICA, for separating geophysical signals in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data. These methods are based on the assumption of the statistical independence of the signals and thus separate the GRACE-observed mass changes into maximal independent signals. These two ICA methods are compared to the conventional principal component analysis (PCA) method. We test the three methods with respect to their ability to separate a periodic hydrological signal from a trend signal originating in the solid Earth or the cryosphere with simulated and Center for Space Research GRACE mass changes for the time period of January 2003 to December 2010. In addition, we investigate whether the methods are capable of separating hydrological annual and semiannual mass variations. It is shown that both ICA methods are superior to PCA when non-Gaussian mass variations are analyzed. Furthermore, the spatiotemporal ICA resolves successfully the lack of full temporal and spatial independence of the geophysical signals observed by GRACE both in global and regional simulation scenarios. Although the temporal and spatiotemporal ICA are nearly equivalent, both superior to PCA in the global GRACE analysis, the spatiotemporal ICA proves to be more efficient in regional applications by recover more reliably the postglacial rebound trend in North America and the bimodal total water storage variability in Africa.
机译:我们研究了两种独立分量分析(ICA)方法(即时间和时空ICA)在重力恢复和气候实验(GRACE)数据中分离地球物理信号的潜力。这些方法基于信号统计独立性的假设,因此将GRACE观测到的质量变化分为最大独立信号。将这两种ICA方法与常规主成分分析(PCA)方法进行了比较。我们对这三种方法的能力进行了测试,并通过模拟和空间研究中心GRACE在2003年1月至2010年12月这段时间内对周期性水文信号与源自固体地球或冰冻圈的趋势信号进行了分离的能力进行了测试。此外,我们调查了这些方法是否能够分离水文年度和半年度质量变化。结果表明,在分析非高斯质量变化时,两种ICA方法均优于PCA。此外,时空ICA成功地解决了GRACE在全球和区域模拟场景中观测到的地球物理信号在时间和空间上都缺乏独立性的问题。尽管时空ICA几乎相等,但在全球GRACE分析中均优于PCA,但时空ICA通过更可靠地恢复北美的冰川后回弹趋势和美国的双峰总蓄水量,证明在区域应用中更有效。非洲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号