...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Evolution >Crocodylian and mammalian carnivore feeding traces on hominid fossils from FLK 22 and FLK NN 3, Plio-Pleistocene, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania
【24h】

Crocodylian and mammalian carnivore feeding traces on hominid fossils from FLK 22 and FLK NN 3, Plio-Pleistocene, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania

机译:坦桑尼亚Olduvai峡谷上新世的FLK 22和FLK NN 3原始人化石上的鳄鱼和哺乳动物食肉动物觅食痕迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Taphonomic analysis of the Olduvai Hominid (OH) 8 left foot from FLK NN Level 3 and the OH 35 left leg from FLK Level 22 (Zinjanthropus level) in Middle Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, indicates that both were fed upon by crocodiles. Both bear extensive tooth marking, including bisected tooth marks diagnostic of crocodylian feeding. The location of the bisected tooth marks on the distal tibia and the talus indicates disarticulation of the foot by crocodiles. The broken proximal ends of the tibia and fibula are more typical of feeding by a leopard-like carnivore, as is damage to the OH 7 mandible and parietals that are associated with and may derive from the same individual as OH 8. Previous work showing a close articulation of the foot and the leg has been used to suggest that the two specimens belong to the same individual despite deriving from sites separated by 200 m and slightly different stratigraphic levels according to previous work. The location and agent of tooth marking and the nature of gross damage do not refute this hypothesis, but the punctures on the talus and distal tibia differ in size and sharpness. Recent work shows that the stratigraphic discrepancy between OH 8 and OH 35 is greater than previously thought, refuting the single-individual hypothesis. Although seemingly unlikely, this denotes that two hominids represented by rarely found leg and foot elements both lost their left foot to crocodiles at nearby sites within a 6,000 year interval. We cannot determine if the hominids were preyed upon by crocodiles or mammalian carnivores. However, the carnivore damage to them and associated faunal remains suggests that high predation risk constrained hominid activities involving discard of the stone artifacts found at these sites. This finding is inconsistent with the interpretation of the sites as home bases or living floors.
机译:对Olduvai峡谷中床I中FLK NN 3级的Olduvai Hominid(OH)8左脚和FLK 22级(Zinjanthropus级)的OH 35左脚进行的车速谱分析表明,两者都是以鳄鱼为食的。两者均具有广泛的牙齿​​标记,包括将鳄鱼喂食的两等分牙齿诊断。胫骨远端和距骨上一分为二的牙齿痕迹的位置表明鳄鱼咬脚。胫骨和腓骨的近端折断更像是豹子食肉动物的进食,对OH 7下颌骨和顶突的损害也与OH 8相同并可能来自同一个人。脚和腿的紧密连接已被用来表明这两个标本属于同一个人,尽管这些标本来自相距200 m的地点,并且根据先前的工作略有不同的地层水平。牙齿标记的位置和原因以及严重损伤的性质并不能反驳这一假说,但是距骨和胫骨远端的穿刺在大小和锐度上都不同。最近的工作表明,OH 8和OH 35之间的地层差异比以前认为的要大,这驳斥了单人假设。尽管看似不太可能,但这表明以很少见的腿和脚元素为代表的两个原始人都在6,000年的间隔内将左脚丢给了附近地点的鳄鱼。我们无法确定原始人是否被鳄鱼或哺乳动物的食肉动物捕食。然而,食肉动物对它们和相关动物群的破坏表明高掠食风险限制了人类活动,涉及丢弃在这些地点发现的石器物。这一发现与将这些场所解释为家庭基地或居住地板不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号