...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Immunological Methods >Multiplex measurement of proinflammatory cytokines in human serum: comparison of the Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence assay and the Cytometric Bead Array.
【24h】

Multiplex measurement of proinflammatory cytokines in human serum: comparison of the Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence assay and the Cytometric Bead Array.

机译:人血清中促炎细胞因子的多重测定:Meso Scale Discovery电化学发光测定法和Cytometric Bead Array的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Serum cytokine profiling is a powerful tool to link host immune defense with disease pathogenesis. Although several multiplex assays are commercially available, none has been rigorously validated in the context of chronic infectious disease (such as HIV infection). Here we compared the measurement of proinflammatory cytokines by two multiplex platforms: the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) electrochemiluminescence assay and the Becton Dickinson Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) flow cytometric assay, using serum samples from HIV-infected and -uninfected donors. We evaluated the ability of these assays to: a) quantify circulating levels of native cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-alpha, IL-12p70, IL-1beta), and b) accurately recover known amounts of recombinant cytokines added to serum samples. Based on the standard curves, the sensitivity of the MSD system was only slightly better than the CBA. However, in serum the MSD platform consistently quantified levels of endogenous IL-12p70, TNF-alpha, and IL-10 that were undetectable by the CBA assay. The MSD assay was also more accurate as determined by an enhanced capacity to recover known concentrations of recombinant cytokines added to serum. Both assays performed equally well in quantifying IL-6 and IL-8, while neither assay quantified IL-1beta with accuracy and precision. Interestingly, HIV infection did not affect the performance of either assay. Overall, the MSD assay provided a more reliable assessment of the proinflammatory cytokines tested in the serum of healthy and HIV-infected individuals.
机译:血清细胞因子谱分析是将宿主免疫防御与疾病发病机制联系在一起的强大工具。尽管有几种多重测定可商购,但在慢性感染性疾病(如HIV感染)中,没有一个经过严格验证。在这里,我们使用来自HIV感染者和未感染者的血清样本,通过两种多重平台比较了促炎细胞因子的测量:中观规模发现(MSD)电化学发光测定和Becton Dickinson细胞计数珠阵列(CBA)流式细胞测定。我们评估了这些测定的能力:a)定量天然细胞因子(IL-6,IL-8,IL-10,TNF-alpha,IL-12p70,IL-1beta)的循环水平,以及b)准确回收已知量添加到血清样品中的重组细胞因子。根据标准曲线,MSD系统的灵敏度仅略高于CBA。但是,在血清中,MSD平台可以持续定量CBA分析无法检测到的内源性IL-12p70,TNF-α和IL-10的水平。通过提高回收到血清中已知浓度的重组细胞因子的能力来确定,MSD分析也更准确。两种测定在定量IL-6和IL-8方面表现均相当好,而两种测定均未准确,准确地定量IL-1beta。有趣的是,HIV感染并不影响任何一种测定的性能。总体而言,MSD分析提供了对健康个体和HIV感染者血清中测试的促炎细胞因子的更可靠评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号