首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Immunological Methods >Validation of FPA and cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and iELISA.
【24h】

Validation of FPA and cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and iELISA.

机译:FPA和cELISA的验证可用于检测牛血清中流产布鲁氏菌的抗体,并与SAT,CFT和iELISA进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The fluorescence polarisation assay (FPA) is a recently described test for the serological diagnosis of Brucella infection. It has many methodological advantages over older, more established tests and can be performed in a fraction of the time. To validate the FPA, serum samples from 146 confirmed (by culture) Brucella-infected cattle were tested in conjunction with serum samples from 1947 noninfected cattle. The competitive ELISA (cELISA) was validated using these positive reference samples and 1440 negative samples, while data for the indirect ELISA (iELISA) was generated from 6957 negative samples plus the positive sera. Published diagnostic specificity (DSp) data for the complement fixation test (CFT) and serum agglutination test (SAT) was used in conjunction with the test results on the positive sera to obtain diagnostic specificity plus diagnostic sensitivity (DSn). After selection of a cutoff for the FPA and cELISA, the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity total for each test were compared. The results, with 95% confidence intervals, were: FPA (195.7+/-2.79), iELISA (195.0+/-2.70), cELISA (194.9+/-3.48), CFT (191.7+/-4.45), and SAT (180.4+/-6.33). The data presented supports the use of the FPA in diagnosis of brucellosis and questions the use of the SAT and CFT for either screening or confirmatory testing.
机译:荧光偏振测定法(FPA)是最近描述的用于布鲁氏菌感染的血清学诊断的测试方法。与较早的,已建立的测试相比,它具有许多方法上的优势,并且可以在短时间内完成。为了验证FPA,对来自146例确诊(通过培养)布鲁氏菌感染的牛的血清样本与1947年未感染牛的血清样本进行了测试。使用这些阳性参考样品和1440阴性样品对竞争性ELISA(cELISA)进行了验证,而间接ELISA(iELISA)的数据则来自6957阴性样品和阳性血清。将已公布的补体固定试验(CFT)和血清凝集试验(SAT)的诊断特异性(DSp)数据与阳性血清的检测结果结合使用,以获得诊断特异性和诊断敏感性(DSn)。选择FPA和cELISA的临界值后,比较每种测试的诊断特异性和总灵敏度。结果具有95%的置信区间,包括:FPA(195.7 +/- 2.79),iELISA(195.0 +/- 2.70),cELISA(194.9 +/- 3.48),CFT(191.7 +/- 4.45)和SAT( 180.4 +/- 6.33)。所提供的数据支持FPA在布鲁氏菌病诊断中的使用,并质疑将SAT和CFT用于筛查或确认性测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号