...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences >A comparison of UV intensities calculated by spherical-atmosphere radiation transfer codes: Application to the aerosol corrections
【24h】

A comparison of UV intensities calculated by spherical-atmosphere radiation transfer codes: Application to the aerosol corrections

机译:通过球形-大气辐射传输代码计算的紫外线强度比较:在气溶胶校正中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Various spherical radiative transfer (SRT) computer codes that model ultraviolet (UV) sky intensities incident at the Earth's surface are compared for clear-sky (Rayleigh scattering and ozone absorption) and hazy-sky (stratospheric volcanic aerosol, Rayleigh scattering, and ozone absorption) atmospheric conditions. Calculated sky intensities using Dave vector (pseudospherical), Dave scalar (pseudospherical), Herman's vector (full spherical), and Herman's scalar (full spherical) codes are compared for various parameters including solar zenith angle, direction of view, and wavelength. The differences in the calculated downward UV intensities are believed to arise from the differences in the code geometries and the neglect of polarization effects. The difference between downward UV intensities is within +/-15% for clear-sky conditions and between -30 and 18% for hazy-sky conditions. The results of comparisons suggest that an experiment should be conducted to measure UV sky intensities for clear-sky conditions, with minimal aerosol, to test the quality of the radiative transfer codes with actual observations. The Dave scalar radiative transfer code has been used in the past to calculate aerosol error corrections to Umkehr measurements. To evaluate the accuracy of these calculations, we performed a set of comparisons with results of various spherical radiative transfer codes. Ground level sky intensities were calculated for various solar zenith angle directions, for a vertically inhomogeneous Rayleigh atmosphere with ozone absorption, including and excluding stratospheric aerosols. For 0.11 stratospheric aerosol optical thickness, the method for calculating stratospheric aerosol errors to retrieved Umkehr ozone profile predicts either -22% or -32% error in layer 8 depending on whether vector or a scalar radiative transfer code had been used. The calculations were also used to study the effect of full spherical and pseudospherical forward model differences on Umkehr ozone profile retrievals. The difference in retrieved ozone profiles was found to be within +/-4% for clear-sky conditions and up to 13% in layer 8 for hazy-sky conditions. The results of these comparisons suggest that further improvements to the profile retrieval and stratospheric aerosol error calculations could he made using a fully spherical RT code that accounts for polarization. [References: 25]
机译:比较了各种球形辐射传输(SRT)计算机代码,它们对入射在地球表面的紫外线(UV)天空强度进行建模,以比较晴空(瑞利散射和臭氧吸收)和朦胧天空(平流层火山气溶胶,瑞利散射和臭氧吸收) )大气条件。比较了使用Dave向量(伪球面),Dave标量(伪球面),Herman向量(全球面)和Herman标量(全球面)代码计算的天空强度的各种参数,包括太阳天顶角,视角和波长。据信,所计算出的向下紫外线强度的差异是由于编码几何形状的差异以及对偏振效应的忽视所致。在晴朗的天空条件下,向下紫外线强度之间的差异在+/- 15%内,在朦胧的天空条件下之间在-30%至18%之间。比较结果表明,应进行实验以在晴朗的天空条件下以最小的气溶胶测量紫外线的天空强度,并通过实际观察来测试辐射转移代码的质量。过去曾使用Dave标量辐射传递代码来计算对Umkehr测量值的气溶胶误差校正。为了评估这些计算的准确性,我们对各种球形辐射传输代码的结果进行了一组比较。计算了不同太阳天顶角方向,吸收臭氧的垂直非均匀瑞利大气层(包括但不包括平流层气溶胶)的地面天空强度。对于平流层气溶胶光学厚度为0.11的情况,用于计算平流层气溶胶误差以获取Umkehr臭氧分布的方法取决于使用的是矢量还是标量辐射转移码,预测第8层的误差为-22%或-32%。该计算还用于研究全球形和准球形正向模型差异对Umkehr臭氧剖面图检索的影响。对于晴空条件,发现的臭氧分布差异在+/- 4%以内,对于朦胧天空条件,在第8层中高达13%。这些比较的结果表明,可以使用考虑到极化的全球形RT代码对轮廓检索和平流层气溶胶误差计算进行进一步的改进。 [参考:25]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号