...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Confluence of incident and reflected waves interferes with systolic foot detection of the carotid artery distension waveform.
【24h】

Confluence of incident and reflected waves interferes with systolic foot detection of the carotid artery distension waveform.

机译:入射波和反射波的交汇会干扰颈动脉扩张波形的收缩压脚检测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Local pulse wave velocity, a direct measure of arterial stiffness, can be measured using the systolic foot of the pressure waveform as the time reference point. The accuracy and precision of systolic foot identification, which may be disturbed by early wave reflections, heavily affects pulse wave transit time measurements. We investigated within subjects the existence of early wave reflections and their interference with systolic foot identification. METHODS: Fourteen ultrasound-derived distension waveforms, spaced over 16.4 mm, were simultaneously recorded in the CCA 3 cm proximal of the bifurcation of 12 young subjects. The second derivatives of the distension waveforms were calculated to identify the systolic foot and an inflection point preceding systolic peak distension. Pulse wave transit time was calculated as the time difference between the most proximal and most distal time-point, using either the systolic foot or the inflection point. The time to reflection (DeltaTSF_IP) was defined as the time difference between the systolic foot and the inflection point. RESULTS: Both transit times (TT SF and TT IP) could be determined with good intrasubject precision: 0.7 and 1.4 ms, respectively. The systolic foot is running forward, TT SF = 3.1 +/- 0.9 ms, whereas the inflection point appears to run backward, TT IP = -3.9 +/- 1.4 ms. DeltaTSF_IP was 44.3 +/- 8.8 ms. CONCLUSION: Despite the good intrasubject reproducibility, confluence of incident and reflected waves disturbs identification and discrimination of the systolic foot and the inflection point, resulting in biased estimates. Therefore both points are unsuitable for local pulse transit time measurements in the common carotid artery.
机译:目的:局部脉搏波速度是动脉僵硬度的直接量度,可以使用压力波形的收缩压脚作为时间参考点进行测量。收缩波识别的准确性和准确性可能会受到早期波反射的干扰,这严重影响了脉搏波传播时间的测量。我们调查了受试者内早期波反射的存在及其对收缩压足识别的干扰。方法:在12名年轻受试者的分叉近3 cm处的CCA中,同时记录了间隔超过16.4 mm的十四个超声源性扩张波形。计算膨胀波形的二阶导数以识别收缩压足和收缩压峰值膨胀之前的拐点。使用收缩压脚或拐点将脉搏波传播时间计算为最近端和最远端时间点之间的时间差。反射时间(DeltaTSF_IP)定义为收缩压脚和拐点之间的时间差。结果:两种转运时间(TT SF和TT IP)都可以被确定为具有较高的受试者内精确度:分别为0.7和1.4 ms。收缩压脚向前运行,TT SF = 3.1 +/- 0.9 ms,而拐点似乎向后运行,TT IP = -3.9 +/- 1.4 ms。 DeltaTSF_IP为44.3 +/- 8.8毫秒。结论:尽管受试者内部具有良好的可重复性,但入射波和反射波的汇合干扰了对收缩期足和拐点的识别和区分,从而导致估计偏差。因此,这两个点都不适合在颈总动脉中进行局部脉冲传输时间测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号