首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition >Eligibility for Free and Reduced Price School Meals and Fruit and Vegetable Intake at Home and at School
【24h】

Eligibility for Free and Reduced Price School Meals and Fruit and Vegetable Intake at Home and at School

机译:在家和学校免费和减价的学校膳食以及水果和蔬菜摄入的资格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this cross-sectional study, the frequency of fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption was assessed in Washington State middle school students eligible for free and reduced price meals (FRPM). Though students eligible for FRPM had lower rates of FV consumption at home compared to noneligible children (x2 value = 17.46, df = 1, P < .001), at school children who were eligible for FRPM had higher rates of FV consumption (x2 value = 14.76, df = 1, P < .001). In logistic regression analysis, students eligible for FRPM had 1.35 greater odds of FV consumption at school (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.55; P < .001) than those from higher income families. Away from school, students eligible for FRPM had lower odds of FV consumption at 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P = .006) compared to students from higher income families. Among Washington State seventh graders, students who had the opportunity to eat school meals at low or no cost had a greater likelihood of FV consumption at school compared to otherstudents.
机译:在这项横断面研究中,评估了华盛顿州中学生有资格享受免费和低价膳食(FRPM)的水果和蔬菜(FV)的食用频率。尽管与不合格儿童相比,符合FRPM的学生在家中FV消费率较低(x2值= 17.46,df = 1,P <.001),而符合FRPM的在校儿童中FV消费率较高(x2值= 14.76,df = 1,P <.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,有资格参加FRPM的学生在学校中参加FV的几率(95%置信区间[CI]为1.18至1.55; P <.001)比高收入家庭的高。与高收入家庭的学生相比,离开学校后,符合FRPM资格的学生的FV消费几率较低,为0.65(95%CI,0.48至0.89; P = .006)。与其他学生相比,在华盛顿州七年级学生中,有机会以低廉的价格或无费用享用学校餐的学生在学校消费FV的可能性更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号