首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Comparing radiosonde and COSMIC atmospheric profile datato quantify differences among radiosonde types and the effectsof imperfect collocation on comparison statistics
【24h】

Comparing radiosonde and COSMIC atmospheric profile datato quantify differences among radiosonde types and the effectsof imperfect collocation on comparison statistics

机译:比较探空仪和COSMIC大气廓线数据以量化探空仪类型之间的差异以及不完美搭配对比较统计的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Collocated global atmospheric temperature, humidity, and refractivity profiles fromradiosondes and from Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, andClimate (COSMIC) radio occultation data for April 2008 to October 2009 are comparedfor two purposes. The first is to quantify the error characteristics of 12 radiosondetypes flown in the global operational network, as a function of height and for both dayand nighttime observations, for each of the three variables. The second is to determinethe effects of imperfect temporal and spatial collocation on the radiosonde-COSMICdifferences, for application to the general problem of satellite calibration and validationusing in situ sounding data. Statistical analyses of the comparisons reveal differencesamong radiosonde types in refractivity, relative humidity, and radiation-correctedtemperature data. Most of the radiosonde types show a dry bias, particularly in the uppertroposphere, with the bias in daytime drier than in nighttime. Weather-scale variability,introduced by collocation time and distance mismatch, affects the comparison ofradiosonde and COSMIC data by increasing the standard deviation errors, which aregenerally proportional to the size of the time and distance mismatch within the collocationwindow of 6 h and 250 km considered. Globally, in the troposphere (850-200 hPa), thecollocation mismatch impacts on the comparison standard deviation errors for temperatureare 0.35 K per 3 h and 0.42 K per 100 km and, for relative humidity, are 3.3% per 3h and 3.1% per 100 km, indicating an approximate equivalence of 3 h to 100 km in termsof mismatch impact.
机译:比较了无线电探空仪和气象,电离层和气候星座观测系统(COSMIC)的卫星掩星数据在2008年4月至2009年10月的全球大气温度,湿度和折射率分布,这有两个目的。首先是对三个变量中每个变量的高度,白天和夜间观测的函数,量化在全球运行网络中飞行的12种无线电探空仪的误差特性。第二个是确定不完善的时间和空间配置对探空仪-COSMIC差异的影响,以便将其应用到使用现场探测数据进行卫星校准和验证的一般问题中。比较的统计分析揭示了探空仪类型在折射率,相对湿度和经辐射校正的温度数据之间的差异。大多数无线电探空仪类型表现出干燥偏见,特别是在对流层上方,白天偏于白天,而夜间偏于干燥。并置时间和距离失配引入的天气尺度变化会通过增加标准偏差来影响探空仪和COSMIC数据的比较,标准偏差通常与所考虑的并置窗口6 h和250 km中时间和距离失配的大小成正比。就全球而言,在对流层(850-200 hPa)中,配位失配对温度的比较标准偏差的影响为每3 h 0.35 K和每100 km 0.42 K,相对湿度为每3h 3.3%和每100 h 3.1% km,表示失配影响的等效范围为3 h至100 km。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号