首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Comment on “A synchronized dating of three Greenland ice cores throughout the Holocene” by B. M. Vinther et al.: No Minoan tephra in the 1642 B.C. layer of the GRIP ice core
【24h】

Comment on “A synchronized dating of three Greenland ice cores throughout the Holocene” by B. M. Vinther et al.: No Minoan tephra in the 1642 B.C. layer of the GRIP ice core

机译:B.M. Vinther等人评论“整个全新世的三个格陵兰冰芯的同步定年”:公元前1642年没有米诺·特非拉。 GRIP冰芯层

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been much debate in recent years among archaeologists and Earth scientists about the date of the Minoan eruption of Santorini (Thera). This debate has centered upon archaeological finds, radiocarbon dating and proxy sources including dendrochronology and acid spikes in the Greenlandic ice cores. Defining the exact date of the Minoan eruption is vital in synchronizing differing chronologies for civilizations around the Mediterranean, where many 2nd millennium B.C. cultures record this cataclysmic event. Current studies of these records have led to suggested dates for the eruption between about 1650 and 1500 B.C., and reconciling these differing dates is clearly vital in archaeology (see Friedrich [2000], Manning [1999] (see further information at http://www.informath.org/BiOr04i.pdf), Manning et al. [2006] and Bietak and Czerny [2007] for further discussion). Recently Vinther et al. [2006], in providing a chronology for the Holocene from Greenlandic ice cores, state that the date for the Minoan eruption (GICC05) is 3641 ± 5 b2k (or 1642 ± 5 B.C.) and that an acid spike from this eruption is present in all three cores (namely, DYE-3, GRIP and NGRIP). Vinther et al. [2006] acknowledge that another source for the glass shards at this level in the ice cores has been proposed as the Alaskan volcano Aniakchak [Pearce et al., 2004]. However, they dismiss this noting [Vinther et al., 2006, p. 9] “analysis of the GRIP ice core has established that the tephra from the eruption arrived in Greenland several months before the arrival of the sulphate aerosols” citing a description by Hammer et al. [2003] of the sulphate/particle distribution. Vinther et al. [2006] suggest that material from an Alaskan volcano would be expected to arrive simultaneously via the tropospheric flow, and note that the delay in the arrival of the sulphate aerosols could only occur if transport were through the stratosphere which they conclude indicates a low-latitude eruption. The presence of an acid spike in the DYE-3 ice core at this time is also argued to indicate a midlatitude eruption as Alaskan and northern latitude volcanic eruptions tend not to be recorded in this more southerly core.
机译:近年来,考古学家和地球科学家之间就圣托里尼(锡拉)的米诺斯火山喷发发生了许多争论。这场辩论的重点是考古发现,放射性碳年代测定和替代来源,包括树丛年代学和格陵兰冰芯中的酸尖峰。定义米诺斯火山喷发的确切日期对于同步地中海周围文明的不同年代是至关重要的,地中海是该地区许多公元前2世纪的文明。文化记录了这一灾难性事件。对这些记录的最新研究已经得出了喷发的建议日期,大约在1650年至1500年。在考古学中,调和这些不同的日期显然至关重要(请参见Friedrich [2000],Manning [1999](请参见http:// www.informath.org/BiOr04i.pdf),Manning等人[2006]以及Bietak和Czerny [2007]进行进一步讨论)。最近Vinther等。 [2006]在提供格陵兰冰芯全新世年代的资料时,指出米诺斯火山喷发(GICC05)的日期为3641±5 b2k(或1642±5 BC),并且在这种喷发中存在酸尖峰这三个核心(即DYE-3,GRIP和NGRIP)。 Vinther等。 [2006]承认,已经提出了在冰芯中此水平的玻璃碎片的另一个来源,即阿拉斯加的阿尼亚克恰克火山[Pearce et al。,2004]。但是,他们没有注意到这一点[Vinther et al。,2006,p。 [9]“对GRIP冰芯的分析已确定,喷发的特非拉虫在硫酸盐气溶胶到达之前数月就到达了格陵兰岛”,引自Hammer等人的描述。 [2003]的硫酸盐/颗粒分布。 Vinther等。 [2006]提出,预计阿拉斯加火山的物质将通过对流层流同时到达,并注意到硫酸盐气溶胶到达的延迟只有在通过平流层运输时才会发生,他们得出的结论是低纬度喷发。有人认为,此时DYE-3冰芯中存在酸尖峰,表明中纬度发生了喷发,因为阿拉斯加和北纬纬度的火山喷发往往没有记录在该更南端的岩心中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号