...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Upper level atmospheric stationary waves in the twentieth century climate of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change simulations
【24h】

Upper level atmospheric stationary waves in the twentieth century climate of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change simulations

机译:政府间气候变化专门委员会模拟二十世纪气候中的高层大气静止波

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The upper level stationary waves are defined as the deviations from longitudinal symmetry of the 250 hPa climatological monthly mean stream function. The climatological averaging period is over the years 1980 to 2000. The coupled model simulations are those of the climate of the 20th Century experiment (20C3M) prescribed by IPCC. The model results are compared to the NCEP/NCAR and ERA40 Reanalyses. The comparison shows the following. (1) The amplitude of the modeled waves in the Northern Hemisphere is generally weaker than observed; that is, modeled flow is too zonal. In the Southern Hemisphere, there are phase as well as amplitude discrepancies but no clear biases. (2) The correlation of the waves in the reanalyses and models in the Northern Hemisphere in winter averages about 0.9, but decreases sharply outside of winter. (3) For many models the correlation of the waves in the reanalyses and models outside of the wintertime Northern Hemisphere is poor, sometimes being less than 0.7. The most prominent systematic error, occurring across all models, is the underestimate of the trough/ridge in the Northern Hemisphere winter over the north Atlantic sector, 60°W–0°W. (4) The models having the coarsest horizontal resolution consistently underperform compared to the others. For models of horizontal resolution finer than approximately 2.5°, the relation to horizontal resolution and fidelity of the simulation is somewhat less clear. (5) The interannual variability of the waves is consistently underestimated by almost all the models throughout the year and over the Northern Hemisphere. The differences between the models and the reanalyses are surprisingly large, given the large scale of the features diagnosed and the fairly long averaging period. Comparison to AMIP2 integrations indicates that differences in the ocean simulation in the coupled models are likely not an overwhelming influence on the agreement with reanalyses.
机译:上层静止波定义为与250 hPa气候月平均流量函数的纵向对称性的偏差。气候平均时期是1980年至2000年。耦合模型模拟是IPCC规定的20世纪实验(20C3M)的气候模拟。将模型结果与NCEP / NCAR和ERA40再分析进行比较。比较显示如下。 (1)北半球模拟波的振幅通常弱于所观测到的;也就是说,建模流过于区域化。在南半球,存在相位和幅度差异,但没有明显的偏差。 (2)北半球冬季再分析和模型中波的相关性平均约为0.9,但在冬季以外急剧下降。 (3)对于许多模型,冬季北半球以外的再分析和模型中的波相关性很差,有时小于0.7。在所有模型中出现的最突出的系统误差是低估了北半球冬季北大西洋60°W-0°W处的低谷/山脊。 (4)水平分辨率最高的模型始终比其他模型表现差。对于水平分辨率小于约2.5°的模型,与水平分辨率和逼真度的模拟关系不太清楚。 (5)全年和北半球的几乎所有模型都始终低估了海浪的年际变化。考虑到所诊断特征的规模大和平均周期长,模型与重新分析之间的差异令人惊讶地大。与AMIP2集成的比较表明,耦合模型中海洋模拟的差异可能不会对重新分析的一致性产生太大的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号