首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Comparison of marine boundary layer cloud properties from CERES-MODIS Edition 4 and DOE ARM AMF measurements at the Azores
【24h】

Comparison of marine boundary layer cloud properties from CERES-MODIS Edition 4 and DOE ARM AMF measurements at the Azores

机译:CERES-MODIS第4版和DOE ARM AMF在亚速尔群岛进行的海洋边界层云特性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Marine boundary layer (MBL) cloud properties derived from the NASA Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) project using Terra and Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data are compared with observations taken at the Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Mobile Facility at the Azores (AMF-Azores) site from June 2009 through December 2010. Cloud properties derived fromARM ground-based observationswere averaged over a 1 h interval centered at the satellite overpass time, while the CERES-MODIS (CM) results were averaged within a 30km×30km grid box centered over the Azores site. A total of 63 daytime and 92 nighttime single-layered overcast MBL cloud cases were selected from 19months of ARM radar-lidar and satellite observations. The CM cloud top/base heights (H_(top)/H_(base)) were determined from cloud top/base temperatures (T_(top)/T_(base)) using a regional boundary layer lapse rate method. For daytime comparisons, the CM-derived H_(top) (H_(base)), on average, is 0.063 km (0.068 km) higher (lower) than its ARMradar-lidar-observed counterpart, and the CM-derived T_(top) and T_(base) are 0.9 K less and 2.5 K greater than the surface values with high correlations (R~2 = 0.82 and 0.84, respectively). In general, the cloud top comparisons agree better than the cloud base comparisons, because the CM cloud base temperatures and heights are secondary products determined from cloud top temperatures and heights. No significant day-night difference was found in the analyses. The comparisons of MBL cloud microphysical properties reveal that when averaged over a 30 km× 30 km area, the CM-retrieved cloud droplet effective radius (r_e) at 3.7μm is 1.3μm larger than that from the ARM retrievals (12.8 μm), while the CM-retrieved cloud liquid water path (LWP) is 13.5 gm~(-2) less than its ARM counterpart (114.2 gm~(-2)) due to its small optical depth (9.6 versus 13.7). The differences are reduced by 50% when the CM averages are computed only using the MODIS pixel nearest the AMF site. Using the effective radius retrieved using 2.1 μm channel to calculate LWP can reduce the difference between the CM and ARM microwave radiometer retrievals from -13.7 to 2.1 gm~(-2). The 10% differences between the ARM and CERES-MODIS LWP and r_e retrievals are within the uncertainties of the ARM LWP (~20gm~(-2)) and r_e (~10%) retrievals; however, the 30% difference in optical depth is significant. Possible reasons contributing to this discrepancy are increased sensitivities in optical depth from both surface retrievals when τ~10 and topography. The τ differences vary with wind direction and are consistent with the island orography.Much better agreement in τ is obtained when using only those data taken when the wind is from the northeast, where topographical effects on the sampled clouds are minimal.
机译:将使用Terra和Aqua中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)数据从NASA云和地球辐射能系统(CERES)项目获得的海洋边界层(MBL)云特性与能源大气辐射测量部(ARM)的观测结果进行了比较)从2009年6月至2010年12月在亚速尔群岛(AMF-Azores)站点的移动设施。从ARM地面观测获得的云特性在1 h间隔内以卫星越过时间为中心平均,而CERES-MODIS(CM)结果为平均在以亚速尔群岛站点为中心的30km×30km网格框中。从19个月的ARM雷达雷达和卫星观测中,总共选择了63白天和92夜间单层阴暗MBL云案例。 CM的云顶/基高(H_(top)/ H_(base))是使用区域边界层流失率方法根据云顶/基温(T_(top)/ T_(base))确定的。对于日间比较,CM派生的H_(top)(H_(base))平均比其ARMradar-lidar观察到的对应对象和CM派生的T_(top)高(低)0.063 km(0.068 km)(低)。 )和T_(base)比具有高相关性的表面值分别小0.9 K和2.5 K(分别为R〜2 = 0.82和0.84)。通常,云顶比较优于云顶比较,因为CM云底温度和高度是根据云顶温度和高度确定的次级产品。在分析中没有发现明显的昼夜差异。 MBL云微物理性质的比较表明,当平均面积为30 km×30 km时,CM回收的云滴有效半径(r_e)为3.7μm,比ARM取回的云滴有效半径(12.8μm)大1.3μm,而由于其光学深度小(9.6比13.7),CM回收的云液态水路径(LWP)比ARM对应的云液态水路径(114.2 gm〜(-2))小13.5 gm〜(-2)。当仅使用最靠近AMF位置的MODIS像素计算CM平均值时,差异将减少50%。使用通过2.1μm通道获取的有效半径来计算LWP可以将CM和ARM微波辐射计获​​取之间的差异从-13.7减小到2.1 gm〜(-2)。 ARM和CERES-MODIS LWP和r_e检索之间的10%差异在ARM LWP(〜20gm〜(-2))和r_e(〜10%)检索的不确定性之内;但是,光学深度的30%差异很明显。造成这种差异的可能原因是,当τ〜10和形貌变化时,来自两个表面的光学深度灵敏度都增加了。 τ的差异随风向的变化而变化,并且与岛屿的地形相一致。仅使用那些来自东北的风获得的数据时,在τ上可以获得更好的τ一致性,而对采样云的地形影响最小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号