...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, D. Atmospheres: JGR >Twentieth century temperature trends in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CESM-LE climate simulations: Spatial-temporal uncertainties, differences, and their potential sources
【24h】

Twentieth century temperature trends in CMIP3, CMIP5, and CESM-LE climate simulations: Spatial-temporal uncertainties, differences, and their potential sources

机译:CMIP3,CMIP5和CESM-LE气候模拟中的20世纪温度趋势:时空不确定性,差异及其潜在来源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The twentieth century climate simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) are compared to assess the models' ability to capture observed near-surface air temperature trends at global, continental, and regional scales. We computed trends by using a nonparametric method and considering long-term persistence in the time series. The role of internal variability is examined by using large ensemble climate simulations from the National Center for Atmospheric Research model Community Earth System Model (CESM). We computed temperature trends for three periods: (1) the twentieth century, (2) the second half of the twentieth century, and (3) the recent hiatus period to contrast the roles of external forcing and internal variability at various spatial and temporal scales. Both CMIP ensembles show statistically significant warming at global and continental scales during the twentieth century. We found a small but statistically significant difference between CMIP3 (0.57 ± 0.07 °C/ century) and CMIP5 (0.47 ± 0.06 °C/century) twentieth century temperature trends, with the CMIP3 estimate being closer to the observations. The spatial structure of long-term temperature trends, and top-of-the atmosphere net radiation trends, suggests that differences in model parameterizations and feedback processes that lead to a smaller net radiative forcing are likely contributing to the differences between CMIP3 and CMIP5. The estimate of internal variability based on the CESM large ensemble spans 24% of the uncertainty in CMIP5 for the twentieth century temperature trends, and 76% for the recent hiatus period, both at global scales, and 43% and almost 100% during the corresponding time periods at regional scales.
机译:比较了耦合模型比较项目第3阶段(CMIP3)和第5阶段(CMIP5)的20世纪气候模拟,以评估模型捕获全球,大陆和区域尺度的近地表气温趋势的能力。我们通过使用非参数方法并考虑时间序列中的长期持久性来计算趋势。内部变率的作用是通过使用国家大气研究模型社区地球系统模型(CESM)的大型整体气候模拟来检验的。我们计算了三个时期的温度趋势:(1)二十世纪,(2)二十世纪下半叶,(3)最近的休止期,以比较外部强迫和内部可变性在各种时空尺度上的作用。两种CMIP组合在20世纪期间均在全球和大陆范围内显示出统计学上显着的变暖现象。我们发现CMIP3(0.57±0.07°C /世纪)和CMIP5(0.47±0.06°C /世纪)二十世纪温度趋势之间存在很小的差异,但在统计学上具有统计学意义,而CMIP3的估算值更接近于观测值。长期温度趋势的空间结构以及大气顶部净辐射趋势表明,模型参数化和反馈过程的差异会导致较小的净辐射强迫,这可能是CMIP3和CMIP5之间差异的原因。在全球范围内,基于CESM大集合的内部变异性估计涵盖了20世纪温度趋势的CMIP5不确定性的24%,以及最近的休止期的不确定性的76%,在相应的全球范围内分别为43%和几乎100%地区范围内的时间段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号