Pigeons Prefer Discriminative Stimuli Independently of the Overall Probability of Reinforcement and of the Number of Presentations of the Conditioned Reinforcer

摘要

When pigeons are given a choice between two alternatives, one leading to a stimulus 20% of the time that always signals reinforcement (S-) or another stimulus 80% of the time that signals the absence of reinforcement (S+) and the other alternative leading to one of two stimuli each signaling reinforcement 50% of the time, the 20% reinforcement alternative is preferred although it provides only 40% as much reinforcement. In Phase 1 of the present experiment, we tested the hypothesis that pigeons compare the S- associated with each alternative and ignore the S+ by giving them a choice between two pairs of discriminative stimuli (20% S-, 80% S+ and 50% S-, 50% S-). Reinforcement theory suggests that the alternative associated with more reinforcement should be preferred but the pigeons showed indifference. In Phase 2, the pigeons were divided into two groups. For one group, the discriminative function was removed from the 50% reinforcement alternative and a strong preference for the 20% reinforcement alternative was found. For the other group, the discriminative function was removed from both alternatives and a strong preference was found for the 50% reinforcement alternative. Thus, the indifference found in Phase 1 was not due to the absence of discriminability of the differential reinforcement associated with the two alternatives (20% vs. 50% reinforcement); rather, the indifference can be attributed to the pigeons’ insensitivity to the differential frequency of the two S+ and two S- stimuli. The relevance to human gambling behavior is discussed.