...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809.
【24h】

Commentary on: Budowle B, Bottrell MC, Bunch SG, Fram R, Harrison D, Meagher S, Oien CT, Peterson PE, Seiger DP,Smith MB, Smrz MA, Soltis GL, Stacey RB. A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(4):798-809.

机译:评论:Budowle B,Bottrell MC,Bunch SG,Fram R,Harrison D,Meagher S,Oien CT,Peterson PE,Seiger DP,Smith MB,Smrz MA,Soltis GL,Stacey RB。司法科学中关于错误,偏见和解释的观点以及不断发展的方向。 J法医学杂志2009; 54(4):798-809。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In their recent article, A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement, Bruce Budowle and his coauthors address many issues of current interest in forensic science, from ethics to statistics (1). We applaud their attempt to initiate a discussion that might foster further development of an over-arching strategy for enhancing the forensic sciences. We hope to contribute to that discussion by commenting on their treatment of our proposal for sequential unmasking procedures (2) designed to minimize bias resulting from domain-relevant information presented prematurely to the examiner.
机译:布鲁斯·布道尔(Bruce Budowle)和他的合著者在他们最近的文章《法医科学中的错误,偏见和解释以及持续发展的方向》中论述了从伦理学到统计学(1)的许多法医科学当前感兴趣的问题。我们赞扬他们为发起讨论而进行的尝试,该讨论可能会促进进一步发展用于增强法医学的总体战略。我们希望通过评论他们对我们建议的顺序揭露程序(2)的处理方式做出贡献,以最大程度地减少因过早呈现给考官的与领域相关的信息而导致的偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号