首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research, A. Space Physics: JGR >Discrepancy between the nighttime molecular ion composition given by the International Reference Ionosphere model and airglow measurements at low latitudes
【24h】

Discrepancy between the nighttime molecular ion composition given by the International Reference Ionosphere model and airglow measurements at low latitudes

机译:国际参考电离层模型给出的夜间分子离子组成与低纬度气辉测量值之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 630-nm nighttime airglow is radiated by O(1 D) atoms, which are produced by the dissociative recombination of O2 + ions. The typical approach used to calculate the red line emission rate at night is based on the assumption that O2 + is mainly produced by the reaction of O+ with molecular oxygen. In the case that the O2 + density is much smaller than the O+ density, [O+] = n e in the F2 region. Good agreement between measured nighttime integrated emission rates and the emission rates calculated by this typical approach, using both electron densities measured by incoherent scatter radars and given by the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model, has been shown. However, the O2 + densities given by the IRI model are much higher than the densities produced by the reaction of O+ with O2, and these densities do not correspond to the condition [O+] = n e . In this case, the typical approach cannot be applied and molecular ions must be included in the emission rate calculations. The integrated emission rates calculated including the molecular ion density given by the IRI model have been found to be much higher than the measured 630.0-nm emission rates. This discrepancy takes place at latitudes below about ±30° in the western longitude sector, mainly for the period from March to November, and the disagreement is higher than 1 order of magnitude at the equator. In addition, we model the F2 region green line O(1 S) emission at 557.7 nm resulting from the dissociative recombination of O2 +. Using measurements of this volume emission rate made by the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) satellite, we are able to show that IRI overestimates the O2 + density (and ion fraction) on the bottomside of the F2 region. A revision of the ion composition in the IRI model on the bottomside seems to be needed on the basis of these results. Airglow measurements may be useful in constraining such a revision. A revision could utilize the formulae for the relationship between the molecular ion densities and neutral densities derived here, using the Mass Spectrometer Incoherent Scatter (MSIS) neutral densities and the IRI electron density. These calculations are based on the assumption that O2 + and NO+ are only produced through ion-molecular reactions. Such a revision would correct the magnitude and altitudinal dependence of the molecular ion fraction in the IRI model.
机译:O(1 D)原子辐射了630 nm的夜间气辉,这些原子是由O2 +离子的解离重组产生的。用于计算夜间红线发射速率的典型方法是基于以下假设:O2 +主要是由O +与分子氧的反应产生的。在O 2 +密度远小于O +密度的情况下,在F2区域中[O +] = n e。使用非相干散射雷达测量的电子密度和国际参考电离层(IRI)模型给出的夜间密度综合测量的排放率与通过这种典型方法计算的排放率之间已显示出良好的一致性。但是,IRI模型给出的O2 +密度比O +与O2反应产生的密度高得多,并且这些密度不符合[O +] = n e的条件。在这种情况下,无法应用典型方法,并且必须在发射率计算中包括分子离子。已经发现,包括IRI模型给出的分子离子密度在内的积分发射率远远高于实测的630.0 nm发射率。这种差异主要发生在西经地区的±30°以下纬度,主要发生在3月至11月,而在赤道上差异超过1个数量级。此外,我们模拟了O2 +的解离重组在557.7 nm处的F2区域绿线O(1 S)发射。通过使用风影干涉仪(WINDII)卫星对该体积发射率进行的测量,我们可以证明IRI高估了F2区域底部的O2 +密度(和离子分数)。根据这些结果,似乎需要对IRI模型底部的离子组成进行修订。气辉测量可能在约束此类修订中很有用。修订版可以利用质谱仪的非相干散射(MSIS)中性密度和IRI电子密度来计算分子离子密度与中性密度之间关系的公式。这些计算基于以下假设:O 2 +和NO +仅通过离子分子反应产生。这样的修订将纠正IRI模型中分子离子部分的大小和高度依赖性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号