首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forest research >Stress responses of Salix gracilistyla and Salix subfragilis cuttings to repeated flooding and drought.
【24h】

Stress responses of Salix gracilistyla and Salix subfragilis cuttings to repeated flooding and drought.

机译:沙柳(Salix gracilistyla)和亚沙柳(Salix subfragilis)插条对反复洪水和干旱的胁迫响应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To compare the responses to repeated flooding and drought of Salix gracilistyla, which grows on coarse gravel substrates, and Salix subfragilis, which grows on fine silt or clay substrates, we measured pre-dawn leaf water potential ( Psi wpd), osmotic adjustment ( Psi wtlp, Psi osat), and biomass production of cuttings under greenhouse conditions. The experimental design involved a control and four treatments that crossed 1 or 3-week flooding (F) with 1 or 2-week droughts (D). Psi wpd was reduced after 2 weeks of drought when preceded by 1 week of flooding. Neither species increased osmotic adjustment in response to increased duration of drought between repeated 3-week flooding. Moreover, a decrease in the ratio of leaf biomass to total biomass or an increase in the ratio of root biomass to total biomass with longer drought repetitions was not observed for either species. The root ratio of S. gracilistyla was more strongly inhibited by flooding than that of S. subfragilis. The shoot-to-root ratio of S. subfragilis was higher than that of S. gracilistyla in all F combinations. The hypertrophied lenticel ratio of S. gracilistyla after 1 week of flooding was nearly the same as that after 3 weeks of flooding, whereas values for S. subfragilis after 1 week of flooding were lower than those after 3 weeks of flooding. The low allocation to roots and the generation of hypertrophied lenticels by S. gracilistyla in response to flooding, as compared with S. subfragilis, seem to be related to the different habitat substrate conditions of the two species.
机译:为了比较生长在粗糙砾石基质上的 Salix gracilistyla 和生长在细粉砂或粘土基质上的 Salix subfragilis 对反复洪水和干旱的响应,我们测量了-黎明叶片水势(Psi w pd ),渗透调节(Psi w tlp ,Psi o sat )和温室条件下of插的生物量生产。实验设计涉及一个对照和四种处理方法,这些处理使1或3周的洪水(F)与1或2周的干旱(D)交叉。干旱2周后Psi w pd 减少,而洪水前1周。在反复的3周洪水之间,干旱持续时间的增加都不会增加渗透调节。此外,在两种干旱情况下,均未观察到叶片生物量与总生物量之比的降低或根生物量与总生物量之比的增加与干旱的重复。 S的根比。与 S相比,水淹对gracilistyla 的抑制作用更大。脆弱的 S的茎根比。脆弱的高于 S。 gracilistyla 在所有F组合中。 S的肥大的皮孔比率。淹水1周后的gracilistyla 与淹水3周后的gracilistyla 几乎相同,而 S值。淹水1周后的亚脆弱性低于淹水3周后的亚脆弱性。根的分配低, S产生了肥大的皮孔。与 S相比,gracilistyla 对洪水的反应。 subfragilis ,似乎与两种物种的不同生境底物条件有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号