...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical pharmacist >Why PCT commissioner and provider functions have split
【24h】

Why PCT commissioner and provider functions have split

机译:PCT专员和提供者职能为何分开

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

At the beginning of last month, Clinical Pharmacist spoke to a primary care pharmacist who we believed to be running a PCT diabetes clinic with a specialist nurse. (We were hunting for someone to write an article for our IN THE CLINIC series.) Unfortunately, we were told, the clinic is no longer in operation because the PCT has had to "separate its provider and commissioner functions". This phrase has been bandied about by primary care pharmacists for several years but we found ourselves wondering whether this process was done and dusted or whether it was still work in progress. It seemed a fair bet that many pharmacists, particularly those working outside PCT land, were probably wondering the same. So we asked Jonathan Mason, national clinical director for primary care and community pharmacy in England, to fill in the blanks.
机译:上个月初,临床药师与一位初级保健药师进行了交谈,我们相信该药师将与一名专职护士一起经营PCT糖尿病诊所。 (我们正在寻找有人为我们的IN CLINIC系列撰写文章。)不幸的是,有人告诉我们,该诊所已不再运营,因为PCT必须“分离其提供者和委托人的职能”。这个短语已经被初级保健药剂师广泛使用了几年,但是我们发现自己想知道这个过程是否已经完成并撒满灰尘,或者它是否仍在进行中。似乎可以肯定地说,许多药剂师,尤其是在PCT土地以外工作的药剂师,可能也想知道同样的事情。因此,我们要求英格兰的初级保健和社区药学国家临床总监乔纳森·梅森(Jonathan Mason)填补空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号