首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Fluids Engineering: Transactions of the ASME >Assessing Rotation/Curvature Corrections to Eddy-Viscosity Models in the Calculations of Centrifugal-Compressor Flows
【24h】

Assessing Rotation/Curvature Corrections to Eddy-Viscosity Models in the Calculations of Centrifugal-Compressor Flows

机译:在离心压缩机流量计算中评估涡流-粘度模型的旋转/曲率校正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rotation and curvature (RC) effects on turbulence are expected to impact losses and flow structure in turbomachines. This paper examines two recent eddy-viscosity-model corrections devised to account for these effects: the Spalart and Shur (1997, "On the Sensitization of Turbulence Models to Rotation and Curvature," Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 1(5), pp. 297-302) correction to the model of Spalart and Allmaras (1994, "A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows," Rech. Aerosp., 1, pp. 5-21) and the correction of Cazalbou et al. (2005, "Two-Equation Modeling of Turbulent Rotating Flows," Phys. Fluids., 17, p. 055110) to the (k,E) model. The method of verification and validation is applied to assess the impact of these corrections on the computation of a centrifugal-compressor test case. First, a review of RC effects on turbulence as they apply to centrifugal compressors is made. The two corrected models are then presented. Second, the Radiver open test case (Ziegler K. U., Gallus, H. E., and Niehuis R., 2003, "A Study on Impeller Diffuser Interaction Part 1: Influence on the Performance," ASME J. Turbomach, 125, pp. 173-182) is used as a basis for the assessment of the two corrections. After a physical-consistency analysis, the Richardson extrapolation is applied to quantify the numerical errors involved in all the calculations. Finally, experimental data are used to perform validation for both global and local predictions. The consistency analysis shows that both corrections lead to significant changes in the turbulent field, in perfect agreement with the underlying theoretical considerations. The uncertainty analysis shows that the predictions of the global performances are more sensitive to grid refinement than they are to RC turbulence modeling. However, the opposite conclusion is drawn with regard to the prediction of some local flow properties: Improvements are obtained with the RC corrections, the best results being observed for the RC-corrected (k,E) model.
机译:旋转和曲率(RC)对湍流的影响预计会影响涡轮机的损失和流动结构。本文研究了为解决这些影响而设计的两个最近的涡流-粘度模型修正:Spalart和Shur(1997,“论湍流模型对旋转和曲率的敏感度”,Aerosp。Sci。Technol。,1(5), 297-302页)对Spalart和Allmaras模型的修正(1994年,“用于空气流的单方程湍流模型”,Rech。Aerosp。,1,第5-21页),以及Cazalbou等人的修正。 (2005,“湍流旋转流的两方程式建模”,Phys.Fluids,17,第055110页)到(k,E)模型。验证和确认方法用于评估这些更正对离心压缩机测试用例计算的影响。首先,回顾了应用于离心压缩机的RC对湍流的影响。然后介绍了两个校正的模型。第二,Radiver开放测试案例(Ziegler KU,Gallus,HE和Niehuis R.,2003,“叶轮扩散器相互作用的研究,第1部分:对性能的影响”,ASME J.Turbomach,125,第173-182页) )用作评估两次更正的基础。经过物理一致性分析后,将使用理查森外推法量化所有计算中涉及的数值误差。最后,实验数据用于对全局和局部预测进行验证。一致性分析表明,两种修正都导致湍流场发生重大变化,与基本的理论考虑完全吻合。不确定性分析表明,与RC湍流模型相比,对整体性能的预测对网格细化更为敏感。但是,对于某些局部流动特性的预测却得出了相反的结论:通过RC修正获得了改进,对于RC修正(k,E)模型观察到了最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号