...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Phonological Typicality Does Not Influence Fixation Durations in Normal Reading
【24h】

Phonological Typicality Does Not Influence Fixation Durations in Normal Reading

机译:语音上的典型性不会影响正常阅读中的固定时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using a word-by-word self-paced reading paradigm, T. A. Fanner, M. H. Christiansen, and P. Monaghan (2006) reported faster reading times for words that are phonologically typical for their syntactic category (i.e., noun or verb) than for words that are phonologically atypical. This result has been taken to suggest that language users are sensitive to subtle relationships between sound and syntactic function and that they make rapid use of this information in comprehension. The present article reports attempts to replicate this result using both eyetracking during normal reading (Experiment 1) and word-by-word self-paced reading (Experiment 2). No hint of a phonological typicality effect emerged on any reading-time measure in Experiment 1, nor did Experiment 2 replicate Farmer et al.'s finding from self-paced reading. Indeed, the differences between condition means were not consistently in the predicted direction, as phonologically atypical verbs were read more quickly than phonologically typical verbs, on most measures. Implications for research on visual word recognition are discussed.
机译:TA Fanner,MH Christiansen和P. Monaghan(2006)使用逐个单词的自定进度的阅读范例,报告了在语音学上属于其句法类别(即名词或动词)的单词的阅读时间比单词快在语音上是非典型的。得出的结果表明,语言用户对声音和句法功能之间的微妙关系很敏感,并且他们在理解中迅速使用了此信息。本文报告了尝试在正常阅读(实验1)和逐字自定进度阅读(实验2)期间使用眼动追踪来复制此结果的尝试。在实验1的任何阅读时间量度中均未发现语音典型性效应的暗示,实验2也没有模仿Farmer等人从自定进度的阅读中得到的发现。实际上,条件均值之间的差异并不是在预测方向上一致,因为在大多数情况下,语音非典型动词的读取速度比语音典型动词更快。讨论了视觉单词识别研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号