首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Psychology. General >If All Your Friends Jumped Off a Bridge: The Effect of Others' Actions on Engagement in and Recommendation of Risky Behaviors
【24h】

If All Your Friends Jumped Off a Bridge: The Effect of Others' Actions on Engagement in and Recommendation of Risky Behaviors

机译:如果您所有的朋友都跳下了桥:他人的行为对参与行为的影响和风险行为的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a large gap between the types of risky behavior we recommend to others and those we engage in ourselves. In this study, we hypothesized that a source of this gap is greater reliance on information about others' behavior when deciding whether to take a risk oneself than when deciding whether to recommend it to others. To test this hypothesis, we asked participants either to report their willingness to engage in a series of risky behaviors themselves; their willingness to recommend those behaviors to a loved one; or, how good of an idea it would be for either them or a loved one to engage in the behaviors. We then asked them to evaluate those behaviors on criteria related to the expected utility of the risk (benefits, costs, and likelihood of costs), and on engagement in the activity by people they knew. We found that, after accounting for effects of perceived benefit, cost, and likelihood of cost, perceptions of others' behavior had a dramatically larger impact on participants' willingness to engage in a risk than on their willingness to recommend the risk or their prescriptive evaluation of the risk. These findings indicate that the influence of others' choices on risk-taking behavior is large, direct, cannot be explained by an economic utility model of risky decision-making, and goes against one's own better judgment. This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
机译:我们推荐给他人的风险行为与我们自己从事的风险行为之间存在很大的差距。在本研究中,我们假设,这种差距的根源在于,在决定是否冒险时比对其他人推荐时更依赖于他人的行为信息。为了检验这一假设,我们要求参与者要么报告自己参与一系列危险行为的意愿,要么报告自己愿意参与一系列危险行为的意愿。他们愿意向亲人推荐这些行为;或者,一个人或他们所爱的人从事这些行为对自己的想法有多好。然后,我们要求他们根据与风险的预期效用(收益,成本和成本的可能性)相关的标准,以及他们认识的人参与活动的标准,对这些行为进行评估。我们发现,在考虑了感知收益,成本和成本可能性的影响之后,对他人行为的感知对参与者参与风险的意愿的影响比对他们推荐风险或进行规范性评估的意愿的影响要大得多。的风险。这些发现表明,他人的选择对冒险行为的影响是巨大的,直接的,不能用风险决策的经济效用模型来解释,并且违背了自己的更好判断。本文档的版权归美国心理学会或其盟约出版商之一所有。本文仅供个人用户个人使用,不能广泛传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号