...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Psychology. General >The Effect of Horizontal Eye Movements on Free Recall: A Preregistered Adversarial Collaboration
【24h】

The Effect of Horizontal Eye Movements on Free Recall: A Preregistered Adversarial Collaboration

机译:视线水平移动对自由召回的影响:预先注册的对抗协作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A growing body of research has suggested that horizontal saccadic eye movements facilitate the retrieval of episodic memories in free recall and recognition memory tasks. Nevertheless, a minority of studies have failed to replicate this effect. This article attempts to resolve the inconsistent results by introducing a novel variant of proponent-skeptic collaboration. The proposed approach combines the features of adversarial collaboration and purely confirmatory preregistered research. Prior to data collection, the adversaries reached consensus on an optimal research design, formulated their expectations, and agreed to submit the findings to an academic journal regardless of the outcome. To increase transparency and secure the purely confirmatory nature of the investigation, the 2 parties set up a publicly available adversarial collaboration agreement that detailed the proposed design and all foreseeable aspects of the data analysis. As anticipated by the skeptics, a series of Bayesian hypothesis tests indicated that horizontal eye movements did not improve free recall performance. The skeptics suggested that the nonreplication may partly reflect the use of suboptimal and questionable research practices in earlier eye movement studies. The proponents countered this suggestion and used a p curve analysis to argue that the effect of horizontal eye movements on explicit memory did not merely reflect selective reporting. This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers. This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
机译:越来越多的研究表明,水平的眼跳运动有助于在自由回忆和识别记忆任务中恢复情节记忆。然而,少数研究未能复制这种效应。本文试图通过引入支持者怀疑论者协作的新颖变体来解决不一致的结果。所提出的方法结合了对抗性合作和纯预先确认研究的特征。在收集数据之前,对手就最佳的研究设计达成共识,制定了他们的期望,并同意不考虑结果而将研究结果提交给学术期刊。为了提高透明度并确保调查的纯粹确认性质,两方建立了公开可用的对抗合作协议,详细说明了拟议的设计以及数据分析的所有可预见方面。正如怀疑论者所预期的那样,一系列贝叶斯假设检验表明,水平眼动并不能改善自由回忆的性能。怀疑者认为,这种非重复性研究可能部分反映了早期眼动研究中使用的次优和可疑的研究实践。支持者反驳了这一建议,并使用p曲线分析论证了水平眼动对显式记忆的影响不仅反映了选择性报道。本文档的版权归美国心理学会或其盟约出版商之一所有。本文仅供个人用户个人使用,不能广泛传播。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号