首页> 外文期刊>Clinical transplantation. >Mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine is associated with decreased acute rejection, late acute rejection, and risk for cardiovascular death in renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes.
【24h】

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine is associated with decreased acute rejection, late acute rejection, and risk for cardiovascular death in renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes.

机译:麦考酚酸酯与硫唑嘌呤相比,移植前糖尿病的肾移植接受者急性排斥反应降低,晚期急性排斥反应和心血管死亡风险较高。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

David KM, Morris JA, Steffen BJ, Chi-Burris KS, Gotz VP, Gordon RD. Mycophenolate mofetil vs. azathioprine is associated with decreased acute rejection, late acute rejection, and risk for cardiovascular death in renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant diabetes. Clin Transplant 2005 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.000338.x (c) Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005Abstract: Outcomes specifically in mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-treated diabetic renal transplant patients have not been previously reported. This study compared acute rejection (AR), late acute rejection (LAR), patient survival [and specifically death from cardiovascular (CV), infectious and malignant causes], incidence of post-transplant malignancies, and graft loss in MMF- or azathioprine (AZA)-treated renal transplant patients with pre-transplant diabetes. Outcomes were compared between MMF- (n = 14 144) and AZA- (n = 3001) treated diabetic patients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on all U.S. adult renal transplants performed between 1995 and 2002. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox multivariable regression and chi-square tests. MMF patients had less AR compared with AZA-treated patients (23.5% vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001) and less risk for LAR over 4 yr [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% CI 0.44, 0.92; p = 0.02]. While time to any-cause death did not differ between the groups, MMF treatment was associated with a 20% decreased risk of CV death (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.67, 0.97; p = 0.020) compared with AZA treatment. MMF patients also had a lower incidence of malignancies than AZA patients (2.2% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). These results suggest treatment with MMF compared with treatment with AZA in diabetic transplant patients is associated with less AR, less risk of LAR, a decreased risk of CV death, and a lower incidence of malignancies.
机译:David KM,Morris JA,Steffen BJ,Chi-Burris KS,Gotz副总裁,Gordon RD。麦考酚酸酯与硫唑嘌呤相比,移植前糖尿病的肾移植接受者急性排斥反应降低,晚期急性排斥反应和心血管死亡风险较高。 Clin Transplant 2005 DOI:10.1111 / j.1399-0012.2005.000338.x(c)Blackwell Munksgaard,2005摘要:以前从未报道过麦考酚酸酯(MMF)治疗的糖尿病肾移植患者的治疗结果。这项研究比较了急性排斥反应(AR),晚期急性排斥反应(LAR),患者存活率(尤其是心血管死亡(CV),感染和恶性原因),移植后恶性肿瘤的发生率以及MMF或硫唑嘌呤的移植物丢失( AZA)治疗的肾移植患者患有移植前糖尿病。使用1995年至2002年间在美国所有成年肾移植患者中进行的“移植受体科学注册”数据,比较了MMF-(n = 14144)和AZA-(n = 3001)治疗的糖尿病患者的结果。统计分析包括Kaplan-Meier生存率分析,Cox多变量回归和卡方检验。与接受AZA治疗的患者相比,MMF患者的AR更少(23.5%比28.3%,p <0.001),并且LAR超过4年的风险更低[危险比(HR):0.64,95%CI 0.44,0.92; p = 0.02]。尽管两组之间因任何原因死亡的时间没有差异,但与AZA治疗相比,MMF治疗可使CV死亡风险降低20%(HR:0.80、95%CI 0.67、0.97; p = 0.020)。 MMF患者的恶性肿瘤发生率也比AZA患者低(2.2%对3.7%,p <0.001)。这些结果表明,在糖尿病移植患者中,与AZA治疗相比,MMF治疗具有更少的AR,更低的LAR风险,更低的CV死亡风险以及更低的恶性肿瘤发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号