...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rheumatology >Immunogenicity, the elephant in the room. Comment on 'drug levels, anti-drug antibodies and clinical efficacy of the anti-TNFα biologics in rheumatic diseases'
【24h】

Immunogenicity, the elephant in the room. Comment on 'drug levels, anti-drug antibodies and clinical efficacy of the anti-TNFα biologics in rheumatic diseases'

机译:免疫原性,房间里的大象。关于“风湿性疾病的药物水平,抗药物抗体和抗TNFα药物的临床疗效”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Biologic therapy has been a major advance in the treatment of patients with immune diseases. Yet, it is clear that long-term disease management requires a more detailed understanding of factors that influence these drugs' effectiveness. The authors confirm at least 10 years of observations that immunogenicity most notably with monoclonal antibody therapies results in treatment failure [1]. By contrast, receptor-based constructs seem less likely to be associated with the development of patient-derived antibody failure [2-4]. Also as pointed out by the authors, the development of neutralizing antibodies is independent of underlying immune disease. It is interesting to note that a recently commissioned consensus statement on biologic treatment of rheumatic disease mentioned immunogenicity two times (one time with regard to abatacept and the other time with regard to concomitant methotrexate). A simultaneous search for neutralizing antibodies was fruitless [5].
机译:生物疗法一直是免疫疾病患者治疗的重大进展。然而,很明显,长期的疾病管理需要更详细地了解影响这些药物疗效的因素。作者确认了至少10年的观察结果,即最重要的是单克隆抗体疗法的免疫原性会导致治疗失败[1]。相比之下,基于受体的构建体似乎不太可能与患者衍生的抗体衰竭有关[2-4]。正如作者所指出的,中和抗体的发展与潜在的免疫疾病无关。有趣的是,最近委托进行的关于风湿性疾病生物治疗的共识声明两次提到了免疫原性(一次是关于abatacept,另一次是关于甲氨蝶呤)。同时寻找中和抗体是徒劳的[5]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号