...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical rheumatology >Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review.
【24h】

Lower gastrointestinal perforation in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with conventional DMARDs or tocilizumab: a systematic literature review.

机译:使用常规DMARDs或tocilizumab治疗的类风湿关节炎患者的下消化道穿孔:系统文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 receptor, has recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium against rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite its overall safety, concerns have been raised regarding diverticular perforation in patients receiving the drug. The aim of our research was to document the incidence of diverticular disease in RA patients treated in the pre-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) era, following treatment with conventional DMARDs, and subsequent to tocilizumab therapy. We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Current Controlled Trials up to Nov. 2010. The publication titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers for relevance and quality, and the review was conducted following guidelines from the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. In the pre-DMARD period of RA management, where patients were largely treated with NSAIDs and corticosteroids, gastrointestinal (GI) complications were a substantial cause of mortality with diverticulitis and colonic ulcers accounting for almost a third of GI-related deaths. In contrast, our search did not reveal any evidence of diverticular perforation in patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Eighteen cases of lower GI perforation (16 of whom had diverticulitis) have been documented in recent conference proceedings following tocilizumab treatment in clinical trials, with a lower GI perforation rate of 1.9 per 1,000 patient years (PY). This lies between the reported rate of GI perforations for corticosteroids and anti-TNF-alpha agents in the United Health Care database, with rates of 3.9 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 3.1-4.8) and 1.3 per 1,000 PY (95% CI 0.8-1.9), respectively. The majority of these patients were concurrently prescribed NSAIDs and/or long-term corticosteroids. Traditional DMARD therapy for RA appears not only to have modified the risk of lower GI perforation but prevented it. The risk of diverticular perforation may be slightly higher in patients treated with tocilizumab compared with conventional DMARDs or anti-TNF agents, but lower than that for corticosteroids. The mechanism of action of IL-6 antagonism in the pathophysiology of diverticular perforation has yet to be elucidated.
机译:Tocilizumab是一种靶向IL-6受体的单克隆抗体,最近已被添加到抗类风湿关节炎(RA)的治疗装备中。尽管其总体安全性,但对于接受该药物的患者的憩室穿孔已引起关注。我们的研究目的是记录在疾病缓解前抗风湿药(DMARD)时代,常规DMARD治疗后以及托珠单抗治疗后治疗的RA患者中憩室疾病的发生率。截至2010年11月,我们在MEDLINE,EMBASE,会议论文集引文索引科学,Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿和现行对照试验中进行了系统的文献综述。出版物的标题和摘要由两名审阅者独立评估了其相关性和质量,审查是按照审查与传播中心的指导进行的。在DMARD之前的RA治疗期间,大部分患者接受NSAIDs和皮质类固醇治疗,胃肠道(GI)并发症是导致憩室炎和结肠溃疡死亡的主要原因,占胃肠道相关死亡的近三分之一。相比之下,我们的搜索没有发现使用常规DMARDs治疗的患者的憩室穿孔的任何证据。在临床试验中,在接受托珠单抗治疗后的近期会议记录中,有18例胃肠道穿孔降低的病例(其中16例患有憩室炎),胃肠道穿孔率较低,每1,000患者年1.9(PY)。这介于联合医保数据库中报道的皮质类固醇和抗TNF-α药物的GI穿孔率之间,分别为3.9 / 1,000 PY(95%CI 3.1-4.8)和1.3 / 1,000 PY(95%CI 0.8) -1.9)。这些患者中的大多数同时接受NSAID和/或长期糖皮质激素治疗。传统的用于RA的DMARD治疗似乎不仅改变了降低胃肠道穿孔的风险,而且可以预防。与传统的DMARD或抗TNF药物相比,接受tocilizumab治疗的患者的憩室穿孔风险可能稍高,但低于皮质类固醇。 IL-6拮抗作用在憩室穿孔的病理生理中的作用机理尚未阐明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号