...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Planning and Management >Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability
【24h】

Re-thinking sustainability indicators: local perspectives of urban sustainability

机译:重新思考可持续性指标:城市可持续性的地方观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Measuring sustainability is not only a contentious issue, but one which has captured the attention of both academics and politicians since the late 1980s. A plethora of methods and approaches have been developed over the last decades or so, from rapid measurements as inputs to specific projects, to longer-term processes of research, monitoring and wider learning. Indicators have been, however, the most influential measuring tool of all and despite the fact that the tensions between expert-led and citizen-led models in their development have fuelled much debate in the literature. It has been suggested that integrating the two approaches would tap into various levels of 'knowledge' of sustainability and thus, be a better way of assessing sustainability. However, little is known of whether these 'integrated' sets of sustainability indicators work in practice, or indeed reflect the local perspectives, values and understandings of sustainability which they aim to represent. This paper aims to fill this gap. First, an 'integrative' set of indicators is designed and second, this is discussed with over 60 'sustainability experts' and 130 residents living in three urban areas in the UK. It is found that the set of indicators is generally a good reflection of urban sustainability in these areas, however, people tend to assign different degrees of 'importance' to individual indicators, something which is little accounted for when measuring urban sustainability. The paper concludes that sustainability indicators are not isolated pieces of information, but manifestations of local underlying processes and interconnections that can be mapped and which have the potential to expand our understanding of local sustainability.
机译:自1980年代末以来,衡量可持续性不仅是一个有争议的问题,而且已经引起了学术界和政界人士的关注。在过去的几十年左右的时间里,已经开发了许多方法和方法,从快速测量作为对特定项目的投入到长期的研究,监控和广泛学习的过程。然而,指标一直是最有影响力的衡量工具,尽管事实是,专家主导的模型和公民主导的模型之间的紧张关系在文献中引发了很多争论。有人提出,将这两种方法结合起来可以利用各种层次的可持续性“知识”,因此,这是评估可持续性的更好方法。然而,人们对这些“综合”的可持续发展指标集是否在实践中起作用,或者实际上是否反映了它们旨在代表的当地对可持续性的观点,价值和理解,知之甚少。本文旨在填补这一空白。首先,设计了一套“综合性”指标,其次,与60多位“可持续发展专家”和居住在英国三个城市地区的130位居民进行了讨论。发现该组指标通常很好地反映了这些地区的城市可持续性,但是人们倾向于给各个指标分配不同程度的“重要性”,这在衡量城市可持续性时很少考虑。本文的结论是,可持续性指标不是孤立的信息,而是可以映射的本地基础流程和相互联系的体现,它们有可能扩大我们对本地可持续性的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号