...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical toxicology: the official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists >Systematic differences between healthcare professionals and poison information staff in the severity scoring of pesticide exposures
【24h】

Systematic differences between healthcare professionals and poison information staff in the severity scoring of pesticide exposures

机译:医护人员和毒物信息人员在农药暴露严重程度评分上的系统差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context. Severity scores are used in triage and for data comparison in cases of poisoning. Exposure severity scores have not been generally validated and their utilization by healthcare staff other than specialists in poison information (SPIs) is untested. Objective. To compare the poisoning severity grading allocated in pesticide exposure cases by healthcare professional enquirers and poison information staff. Methods. Pesticide exposures reported to the U.K. National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) systems in a prospective study were graded for severity by healthcare professional enquirers and NPIS SPIs who used established poisons severity-grading algorithms. The scores were compared in children and adults, for the two professional groupings, both overall and for separate pesticides. Results. Overall SPIs graded severity resulting from pesticide exposure at a lower level than the enquirer. For children, enquirer mean severity score was 1.62 (95 confidence interval (CI) 1.571.66) and SPIs mean severity score was 1.16 (95 CI 1.131.19) (p < 0.001). For adults, enquirer mean severity score was 1.91 (95 CI 1.841.97) and SPIs mean severity score was 1.74 (95 CI 1.691.79) (p < 0.001). Importantly, the differences in the scores between the two professional groups were greater in children [0.46 (95 CI 0.410.51)] than in adults [0.17 (95 CI 0.110.24)] (p < 0.001). Findings for individual pesticides were less consistent but in general showed similar trends. The exception was glyphosate for which severity grading by poison information staff was higher for children [SPIs 1.68 (95 CI 1.381.96) than the enquirers 1.26 (95 CI 1.081.44), p < 0.02]. Conclusions. Our findings suggest inherent differences in the perception of pesticide toxicity between healthcare professionals and SPIs. There was also a difference in the scoring approach depending on the pesticide involved. Additional investigations are required to define the role and accuracy of severity scoring in different types of poisoning and the applicability to different types of severity assessors.
机译:上下文。严重度评分用于分类,中毒时用于数据比较。暴露严重性分数通常尚未得到验证,除毒物信息(SPI)专家以外的医疗保健人员对暴露度的得分也未经测试。目的。比较医疗保健专业询问者和毒物信息工作人员在农药暴露病例中分配的中毒严重度等级。方法。由前瞻性研究报告给英国国家毒物信息服务(NPIS)系统的农药暴露由医疗保健专业询问者和NPIS SPI(使用已建立的毒物严重性分级算法)进行了严重性分级。比较了两个专业组在儿童和成人中的总体和单独农药的得分。结果。总体SPI对农药暴露的严重程度分级为低于询问者。对于儿童,询问者的平均严重性评分为1.62(95置信区间(CI)1.571.66),而SPI的平均严重性评分为1.16(95 CI 1.131.19)(p <0.001)。对于成年人,询问者的平均严重性评分为1.91(95 CI 1.841.97),而SPI的平均严重性评分为1.74(95 CI 1.691.79)(p <0.001)。重要的是,两个专业组之间的得分差异在儿童中[0.46(95 CI 0.410.51)]比在成年人中[0.17(95 CI 0.110.24)]大(p <0.001)。单个农药的发现不太一致,但总体上显示出相似的趋势。草甘膦是一个例外,草甘膦由毒物情报人员对儿童进行严重分级[SPIs 1.68(95 CI 1.381.96)比询问者1.26(95 CI 1.081.44),p <0.02]。结论我们的发现表明,医护专业人员和SPI之间对农药毒性的认识存在固有差异。根据所使用的农药,评分方法也有所不同。需要进行其他调查来确定严重程度评分在不同类型中毒中的作用和准确性,以及对不同类型严重程度评估者的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号