...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical toxicology: the official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists >Lithium poisoning in the intensive care unit: predictive factors of severity and indications for extracorporeal toxin removal to improve outcome
【24h】

Lithium poisoning in the intensive care unit: predictive factors of severity and indications for extracorporeal toxin removal to improve outcome

机译:重症监护室锂中毒:严重程度的预测因素和清除体内毒素以改善结局的适应症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context: Lithium is responsible for life-threatening poisoning, not consistently improved by extracorporeal toxin removal (ECTR).Objective: Our aim was to identify predictive factors on admission of poisoning severity and based on an evaluation of practice, report indications for ECTR susceptible to improve outcomeMethods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all lithium-poisoned patients admitted to the ICU in a university hospital. The usual clinical, biological and toxicological variables were collected. Poisoning severity was defined by seizures, catecholamine infusion, mechanical ventilation >48h and/or fatality. Univariate followed by multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify prognosticators of poisoning severity and ECTR use.Results: From 1992 to 2013, 128 lithium-poisoned patients including acutely (10%), acute-on-chronically (63%) and chronically poisoned patients (27%) were included. The presumed ingested dose of lithium was 17.0g [8.0-24.5] (median [25th-75th percentiles]). Serum lithium concentrations were 2.6mmol/l [1.5-4.6], 2.8mmol/l [1.8-4.5] and 2.8mmol/l [2.1-3.0] on admission, peaking at 3.6mmol/l [2.6; 6.2], 4.3mmol/l [2.4; 6.2] and 2.8mmol/l [2.1; 3.1] in the three groups, respectively. Severe poisoning occurred in 48 patients (38%) including four fatalities. Using the regression analysis, predictive factors of poisoning severity were Glasgow coma score 10 (Odds ratio (OR), 11.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), [4.1-33.3], p<0.0001) and lithium concentration 5.2mmol/l (OR, 6.0; CI, [1.7-25.5], p=0.005). Ninety-eight patients (77%) developed acute kidney injury according to KDIGO criteria and 22 (17%) were treated with ECTR. Peak lithium concentration 5.2mmol/l (OR, 22.4; CI, [6.4-96.4]; p<0.0001) and peak creatinine concentration 200mol/l (OR, 5.0; CI, [1.4-19.2]; p=0.01) were associated with ECTR use. Only 21/46 patients who presented one of these two criteria were actually treated with ECTR. More significant neurological impairment persisted on discharge in patients not treated with ECTR (p=0.0007) despite not significantly shorter length of ICU stay.Conclusions: Lithium poisoning is responsible for severe impairments but rare fatalities. Severity can be predicted on admission using Glasgow coma score and lithium concentration. Our results suggest that ECTR could be indicated if serum lithium 5.2mmol/l or creatinine 200mol/l.
机译:背景:锂是导致生命危险的中毒的原因,不能通过体外毒素清除(ECTR)持续改善。目的:我们的目的是确定中毒严重程度的预测因素,并根据实践评估,报告易感性ECTR的适应症改善结果方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,其中包括在大学医院中所有入住ICU的锂中毒患者。收集通常的临床,生物学和毒理学变量。中毒的严重程度由癫痫发作,儿茶酚胺输注,> 48小时的机械通气和/或死亡确定。结果:从1992年到2013年,有128名锂中毒患者包括急性(10%),慢性急性(63%)和慢性中毒,进行了单因素分析和多元逻辑回归分析,以确定中毒严重程度和ECTR使用的预后因素。患者(27%)被包括在内。锂的估计摄入量为17.0g [8.0-24.5](中位数[25-75%])。入院时血清锂浓度为2.6mmol / l [1.5-4.6],2.8mmol / l [1.8-4.5]和2.8mmol / l [2.1-3.0],峰值为3.6mmol / l [2.6; 6.2],4.3mmol / l [2.4; 6.2]和2.8mmol / l [2.1; [3.1]。严重中毒发生在48例患者中(38%),其中包括4人死亡。使用回归分析,中毒严重程度的预测因素是格拉斯哥昏迷评分10(几率(OR),11.1; 95%置信区间(CI),[4.1-33.3],p <0.0001)和锂浓度5.2mmol / l( OR,6.0; CI,[1.7-25.5],p = 0.005)。根据KDIGO标准,有98名患者(77%)出现了急性肾脏损伤,而ECTR治疗了22名患者(17%)。锂的峰值浓度为5.2mmol / l(OR,22.4; CI,[6.4-96.4]; p <0.0001)和肌酐的峰值浓度为200mol / l(OR,5.0; CI,[1.4-19.2]; p = 0.01)与ECTR一起使用。实际符合这两个标准之一的21/46例患者接受了ECTR治疗。尽管未明显缩短ICU住院时间,但未接受ECTR治疗的患者出院后仍存在更严重的神经功能障碍。结论:锂中毒可导致严重功能障碍,但可导致罕见的死亡。使用格拉斯哥昏迷评分和锂浓度可以预测入院时的严重程度。我们的结果表明,如果血清锂5.2mmol / l或肌酐200mol / l可以指示ECTR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号