首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Short-term tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension: a prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, three-period crossover pilot study.
【24h】

Short-term tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension: a prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, three-period crossover pilot study.

机译:在青光眼和/或高眼压症中,每日一次噻吗洛尔半水合物0.5%,马来酸替莫洛尔0.5%的山梨酸酯和一般性替莫洛尔马来酸酯形成凝胶的溶液0.5%的短期耐受性:前瞻性,随机,双盲,主动控制,三期交叉试点研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare symptoms and anterior segment tolerability with short-term (3-day) administration of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol maleate in sorbate 0.5%, and generic timolol maleate gel-forming solution 0.5% in the treatment of glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, 3-period crossover pilot study, eligible patients had primary open-angle, pigment-dispersion, or exfoliation glaucoma, and/or ocular hypertension in > or = 1 eye; had a best corrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better in each eye, as measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing chart; were receiving 1 glaucoma medication; and had an untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) of < or = 28 mm Hg in both eyes after washout (if required) at visit 2 (day 0). Patients were assigned to receive, in randomized order, timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol in sorbate 0.5%, or generic timolol gel-forming solution 0.5%, 1 drop each morning (approximately 8 am) in the qualified eye(s) (washout IOP < or = 28 mm Hg) for 3 days. Each treatment period was separated by a 7-day washout period. At all baseline and end-of-treatment study visits, patients completed a solicited symptom survey (used for the assessment of stinging or burning [grade 0 = none to 4 = severe] and blurred or dimmed vision [grade 0 = none to 4 = severe], among other parameters) and underwent ETDRS, Goldmann applanation tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, anterior segment staining (corneal, conjunctival nasal, and conjunctival temporal staining), conjunctival hyperemia assessment, measurement of tear breakup time, and Schirmer's testing with anesthesia. At end-of-treatment assessments, patients were questioned about adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled (15 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [8.9] years; white, 19 patients, black, 11; primary open-angle glaucoma, 17; ocular hypertension, 13). Mean (SD) stinging or burning grade was significantly greater with timolol in sorbate compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol gel-forming solution (0.9 [0.9] vs 0.4 [0.6] and 0.2 [0.6], respectively; P < 0.001). The between-treatment differences on anterior segment staining, conjunctival hyperemia, tear breakup time, and Schirmer's testing with anesthesia were not significant, with the exception of the change from baseline in conjunctival nasal staining by count, which was significantly higher with timolol gel-forming solution compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (3.1 [13.4] vs -2.9 [10.1] and -3.0 [8.0], respectively; P = 0.04). On the solicited symptom survey, timolol gel-forming solution was associated with a poorer mean score on blurred or dimmed vision compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (0.3 [0.7] vs 0.1 [0.3] and 0.0 [0.2], respectively; P = 0.02). Mean best corrected ETDRS visual acuity immediately after instillation was significantly lower with timolol gel-forming solution compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate (49.6 [8.4] vs 53.0 [6.1] and 53.1 [6.7], respectively; P = 0.007). The mean 24-hour trough IOP did not differ significantly between the 3 treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study that compared the symptoms and tolerability of once-daily timolol hemihydrate 0.5%, timolol in sorbate 0.5%, and timolol gel-forming solution 0.5% in these patients with glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension, short-term (3-day) administration of timolol in sorbate was associated with more stinging or burning compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol gel-forming solution. Timolol gel-forming solution was associated with more postinstillation blurred or dimmed vision compared with timolol hemihydrate and timolol in sorbate.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较短期(3天)每天一次服用0.5%替莫洛尔半水合物,马来酸替莫洛尔0.5%山梨酸酯和普通替莫洛尔马来酸酯凝胶形成溶液0.5的短期(3天)症状和前段耐受性%用于治疗青光眼和/或高眼压。方法:在这项前瞻性,随机,双盲,主动控制,三期交叉试验研究中,合格的患者患有原发性开角型,色素弥散性或剥脱性青光眼和/或高眼压≥1眼;使用早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力测试表测得的每只眼睛的最佳矫正视力为1.0或更高;正在接受1种青光眼药物治疗;并且在第2次就诊(第0天)冲洗后(如果需要)两只眼睛的未处理眼压(IOP)≤28 mm Hg。随机分配患者接受合格的眼睛中的timolol半水合物0.5%,timolol的山梨酸酯0.5%或普通的timolol凝胶形成溶液0.5%,每天早晨(大约上午8点)滴1滴(冲洗IOP) <或= 28毫米汞柱)3天。每个治疗期间隔7天的清除期。在所有基线和治疗结束后的访视中,患者均完成了征集症状调查(用于评估刺痛或烧伤[0级=无至4 =严重]和视力模糊或变暗[0级=无至4 = =严重]等参数),并接受ETDRS,戈德曼压平眼压计,裂隙灯生物显微镜检查,前节染色(角膜,结膜鼻和结膜时间性染色),结膜充血评估,泪液破裂时间的测量以及Schirmer的麻醉检查。在治疗结束时评估中,询问患者不良事件。结果:招募了30例患者(男15例,女[SD]平均年龄66.3 [8.9]岁;白人19例,黑人11例;原发性开角型青光眼17例;高眼压症13例)。与替莫洛半水合物和替莫洛尔凝胶形成溶液相比,替莫洛尔在山梨酸酯中的平均(SD)刺痛或灼烧等级显着更高(分别为0.9 [0.9]和0.4 [0.6]和0.2 [0.6]; P <0.001)。眼前节染色,结膜充血,泪液破裂时间和麻醉的Schirmer's试验之间的治疗间差异无显着性,但结膜鼻染色计数与基线相比的变化除外,噻吗洛尔凝胶法显着高于基线与替莫洛尔半水合物和替莫洛尔在山梨酸酯中的溶液相比(分别为3.1 [13.4]对-2.9 [10.1]和-3.0 [8.0]; P = 0.04)。在征集症状调查中,与替莫洛尔半水合物和替莫洛尔在山梨酸酯中的含量相比,替莫洛尔凝胶形成溶液与视力模糊或昏暗的平均评分差(分别为0.3 [0.7],0.1 [0.3]和0.0 [0.2]; P = 0.02)。与使用替莫洛尔半水合物和替莫洛尔的山梨酸酯相比,使用替莫洛尔凝胶形成溶液滴注后的平均最佳校正ETDRS视力显着降低(分别为49.6 [8.4]对53.0 [6.1]和53.1 [6.7]; P = 0.007)。 3种治疗之间的平均24小时低谷眼压没有显着差异。结论:在这项初步研究中,比较了青光眼和/或高眼压患者每日一次使用替莫洛尔半水合物0.5%,替莫洛尔0.5%山梨酸酯和替莫洛尔凝胶形成溶液0.5%的症状和耐受性,与替莫洛尔半水合物和替莫洛尔凝胶形成溶液相比,在山梨酸酯中给予替莫洛尔3天)与刺痛或灼伤的发生有关。与替莫洛尔半水合物和替莫洛尔在山梨酸酯中相比,滴加替莫洛尔凝胶形成溶液与更多的滴注后视力相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号