...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Real-world dose-relativity, tablet burden, and cost comparison of conversion between sevelamer hydrochloride/carbonate and lanthanum carbonate monotherapies
【24h】

Real-world dose-relativity, tablet burden, and cost comparison of conversion between sevelamer hydrochloride/carbonate and lanthanum carbonate monotherapies

机译:现实世界中的剂量相关性,片剂负担以及司维拉姆盐酸盐/碳酸盐与碳酸镧镧单药疗法之间的转化成本比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose Sevelamer hydrochloride/carbonate (SH/C) and lanthanum carbonate (LC) are noncalcium-based phosphate binders used for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The objectives of this study were to examine the dose-relativity, tablet burden, and cost difference of bidirectional conversion between SH/C and LC monotherapy in a large cohort of real-world patients with ESRD.Methods This retrospective cohort study included three 30-day preconversion periods (days -90 to -61, -60 to -31, and -30 to -1) followed by three 30-day postconversion periods (days 1 to 30, 31 to 60, and 61 to 90); day 0 was the index date of conversion. The full analysis population (FAP) comprised two cohorts: SH/C to LC (S-L) converters and LC to SH/C (L-S) converters. The SH/C:LC dose-relativity ratio was assessed in the dose-relativity subset, defined as patients whose serum phosphate levels fell within a caliper range of ±0.5 mg/dL in the final preconversion (days -30 to -1) and postconversion (days 61 to 90) periods. Tablet burden and phosphate binder costs were assessed in the FAP. Phosphate binder costs were based on average wholesale prices. absp Findings The FAP contained a total of 303 patients, comprising the S-L (128 patients) and L-S (175 patients) converter cohorts. The dose-relativity subset contained 159 patients, 72 from the S-L cohort and 87 from the L-S cohort. The overall mean SH/C:LC dose-relativity ratio was 2.27 (95% CI, 2.04 to 2.52). In SH/C dose strata >800 to 2400, >2400 to 4800, >4800 to 7200, and >7200 mg/d, overall mean dose-relativity ratios were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.10), 1.45 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.75), 2.05 (95% CI, 1.75 to 2.39), and 3.24 (95% CI, 2.89 to 3.66), respectively. The overall mean tablet burden was 6.6 tablets per day lower with LC monotherapy than with SH/C monotherapy (95% CI, -7.1 to -6.0; P < 0.0001). The overall mean binder cost/patient per month was $1080.40 for SH/C compared with $1006.20 for LC, corresponding to a mean binder cost saving for LC of $74.20/patient per month (95% CI, -141.80 to -6.63; P = 0.032). SH/C >7800 mg/d was the inflection point at which conversion to LC resulted in mean cost savings. Patients requiring SH/C >7800 mg/d comprised 50% of the FAP. absp Implications Converting patients with ESRD and hyperphosphatemia from SH/C to LC monotherapy offers potential drug cost savings and a significant reduction in the daily tablet burden, without compromising the effective management of serum phosphate levels.
机译:目的盐酸司维拉姆/碳酸盐(SH / C)和碳酸镧(LC)是非钙基磷酸盐结合剂,用于晚期肾病(ESRD)患者的高磷酸盐血症的治疗。这项研究的目的是研究在现实世界中大量ESRD患者队列中SH / C和LC单药治疗之间的剂量相关性,片剂负担以及双向转换的费用​​差异。转换前的几天(第-90到-61天,-60到-31和-30到-1天),然后是三个30天的转换后阶段(第1到30天,31到60天和61到90天);第0天是转换的索引日期。全面分析人群(FAP)包括两个队列:SH / C到LC(S-L)转换器和LC到SH / C(L-S)转换器。在剂量相对性亚组中评估了SH / C:LC剂量相对性比,定义为在最终的预转换(第-30天至-1天)中血清磷酸盐水平在±0.5 mg / dL的卡尺范围内的患者,以及转换后(第61至90天)期间。在FAP中评估了片剂的负担和磷酸盐粘合剂的成本。磷酸盐粘合剂的成本基于平均批发价格。绝对结果FAP共包括303例患者,包括S-L(128例患者)和L-S(175例患者)转化人群。剂量相关性子集包含159名患者,其中S-L队列72名,L-S队列87名。 SH / C:LC的总体平均相对剂量比为2.27(95%CI,2.04至2.52)。在SH / C剂量层中,> 800至2400,> 2400至4800,> 4800至7200和> 7200 mg / d,总体平均剂量相对比分别为0.79(95%CI,0.57至1.10),1.45(95%) CI,1.20至1.75),2.05(95%CI,1.75至2.39)和3.24(95%CI,2.89至3.66)。 LC单药治疗的总平均片剂负担比SH / C单药治疗的每天平均减少6.6片(95%CI,-7.1至-6.0; P <0.0001)。 SH / C的每位患者每月总平均粘合剂成本为1080.40美元,而LC的总平均患者成本为1006.20美元,相当于LC的每位患者平均平均粘合剂成本节省74.20美元/患者每月(95%CI,-141.80至-6.63; P = 0.032 )。 SH / C> 7800 mg / d是拐点,在该拐点处,转换为LC可以平均节省成本。需要SH / C> 7800 mg / d的患者占FAP的50%。 absp的含义将ESRD和高磷酸盐血症的患者从SH / C转变为LC单药治疗可以节省药物成本并显着降低每日片剂负担,同时又不影响对血清磷酸盐水平的有效管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号