首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Assessment of Apical Extrusion during Root Canal Irrigation with the Novel GentleWave System in a Simulated Apical Environment
【24h】

Assessment of Apical Extrusion during Root Canal Irrigation with the Novel GentleWave System in a Simulated Apical Environment

机译:新型GentleWave系统在模拟根尖环境中评估根管灌溉过程中的根尖挤压

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: This study assessed apical extrusion during treatment with Gentle Wave (GW; Sonendo Inc, Laguna Hills, CA), a conventional open-ended 30-G needle (CN), or Endovac (EV; SybronEndo, Orange, CA) in root canals enlarged to different dimensions with and without apical constriction. Methods: Sixteen mandibular molars were mounted in an in vitro apparatus. Roots were immersed in a pressure-regulated chamber containing distilled water with pressure kept at 5.88 +/- 0.15 mm Hg to simulate periapical back pressure. Mesiobuccal (curved <= 30 degrees) and distal (straight) canals were instrumented to the working length (WL) as follows: minimal instrumentation (MI, #15/.04), traditional instrumentation (#35/.06), or overinstrumentation (OI, #35/.06, to the WL + 1 mm). Canals were tested 5 times each with distilled water using GW, CN (at WL-3 mm), or EV and the mass (g) of extruded water recorded. Extrusion frequency and mean extruded mass were compared for each canal, irrigation group, and canal instrumentation mode (Wilcoxon t test, P < .05). Results: No extrusion occurred with GW and EV, whereas the frequency of extrusion with CN was 33%. Mean extruded water mass using CN ranged in mesial canals from 0.000 +/- 0.000 g (OI) to 0.047 +/- 0.098 g (MI) and in distal canals from 0.123 +/- 0.191 g (MI) to 0.505 +/- 0.490 g (OI). With traditional instrumentation and 01 instrumentation, extruded mass in distal canals was significantly higher than in mesial canals (P < .002) and distal canals with MI (P < .020). Conclusions: Within this study's limitations, root canal treatment with GW and irrigation with EV was not associated with extrusion. Extruded irrigation mass using the open-ended 30-G needle depended on the canal type and enlargement. These results have to be interpreted with caution, and further investigations are warranted to evaluate the possibility of extrusion using GW in different tooth types and clinical situations.
机译:简介:这项研究评估了用根部开放式传统30-G针(CN)或内圆(EV; SybronEndo,Orange,CA)进行的Gentle Wave(GW; Sonendo Inc,Laguna Hills,CA)治疗过程中的根尖挤压根管有无,根尖狭窄可扩大至不同尺寸。方法:在体外器械中安装16个下颌磨牙。将根浸入含有蒸馏水的调压室中,压力保持在5.88 +/- 0.15 mm Hg,以模拟根尖周背压。按以下方式将近颊(弯曲<= 30度)和远端(笔直)的根管器械固定到工作长度(WL):最小器械(MI,#15 / .04),传统器械(#35 / .06)或过度器械(OI,#35 / .06,至WL + 1毫米)。使用GW,CN(WL-3毫米)或EV用蒸馏水分别对运河进行5次测试,并记录挤出水的质量(克)。比较每个渠道,灌溉组和渠道仪表模式的挤压频率和平均挤压质量(Wilcoxon t检验,P <.05)。结果:GW和EV没有发生挤压,而CN的挤压频率为33%。使用CN的平均挤压水量在中运河的范围从0.000 +/- 0.000 g(OI)到0.047 +/- 0.098 g(MI),而在远端的运河的范围从0.123 +/- 0.191 g(MI)到0.505 +/- 0.490 g(OI)。使用传统器械和01器械时,远端管的挤压质量显着高于中耳道(P <.002)和MI远端管(P <.020)。结论:在这项研究的局限性内,GW根管治疗和EV冲洗与挤压术无关。使用开放式30-G针头挤压的灌溉质量取决于渠道的类型和扩大程度。必须谨慎解释这些结果,并需要进行进一步的研究以评估在不同的牙齿类型和临床情况下使用GW进行挤压的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号