首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Efficacy of 3 Different Irrigation Systems on Removal of Calcium Hydroxide from the Root Canal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Stud
【24h】

Efficacy of 3 Different Irrigation Systems on Removal of Calcium Hydroxide from the Root Canal: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Stud

机译:三种不同灌溉系统对根管内氢氧化钙去除的功效:扫描电子显微镜螺柱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation systems on removing calcium hydroxide (Ca[OH](2)) from the root canal by using a scanning electron microscope. Methods: Forty extracted single-rooted teeth were divided randomly into 4 groups. Canal instrumentation was done, and the teeth were filled with Ca(OH)(2) paste. One week later, 4 techniques were used for Ca(OH)(2) removal. In the first group, the canals were cleaned with a master apical file. The second, third, and fourth groups were irrigated using the EndoVac (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA), EndoActivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), and ProUltra (Dentsply Tulsa, Tulsa, OK) systems, respectively. All the groups were irrigated with 3 mL (18%) EDTA and 3 mL (1%) NaOCl for 1 minute. The canal walls were viewed, and the remaining amount of Ca(OH)(2) was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. A scoring system was used to assess the amount of residue Ca(OH)(2) on each third of the canal. The obtained data for comparisons between the conventional irrigation needle and each device were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: To compare the 4 devices, the results were statistically analyzed using the analysis of variance test. Conclusions: None of the investigated techniques removed the Ca(OH)(2) dressing completely. However, the EndoActivator System showed better results in removing Ca(OH)(2) in each third of the root canals in comparison with the other techniques.
机译:简介:这项研究的目的是通过使用扫描电子显微镜评估不同灌溉系统对根管去除氢氧化钙(Ca [OH](2))的有效性。方法:将四十颗拔出的单根牙齿随机分为4组。进行了根管器械检查,并用Ca(OH)(2)糊剂填充了牙齿。一周后,使用了4种技术去除Ca(OH)(2)。在第一组中,根尖主锉清洁了根管。第二,第三和第四组分别使用EndoVac(Discus Dental,Culver City,CA),EndoActivator(Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties,Tulsa,OK)和ProUltra(Dentsply Tulsa,Tulsa,OK)系统进行灌溉。所有组均用3 mL(18%)EDTA和3 mL(1%)NaOCl灌溉1分钟。观察管壁,并使用扫描电子显微镜评估Ca(OH)(2)的剩余量。使用评分系统评估运河每三分之一处残渣Ca(OH)(2)的量。使用Mann-Whitney U检验对获得的数据进行比较,以比较传统的灌溉针头和每个设备。结果:为了比较这4种设备,使用方差分析对结果进行了统计分析。结论:没有一项研究的技术可以完全去除Ca(OH)(2)敷料。但是,与其他技术相比,EndoActivator系统在去除每根根管的Ca(OH)(2)方面显示出更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号