首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Effect of acid etching procedures on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate-based endodontic cements
【24h】

Effect of acid etching procedures on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate-based endodontic cements

机译:酸蚀工艺对4种硅酸钙基牙髓水泥抗压强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acid etching on the compressive strength of 4 calcium silicate-based cements. Methods One gram of each corresponding powder of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN), MTA Angelus (Angelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil), and CEM cement (BioniqueDent, Tehran, Iran) and a 0.33-g aliquot of liquid were placed in a plastic mixing capsule that was then mechanically mixed for 30 seconds at 4500 rpm in an amalgamator. For the preparation of Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur-des-Fossés, France), the liquid provided was added to the powder within the plastic capsule supplied by the manufacturer and then mechanically mixed for 30 seconds at 4500 rpm using the amalgamator. The resulting slurries were then placed incrementally into 40 cylindrical molds to give a total of 160 specimens that were incubated at 37 C for a week. Twenty specimens of each material were then subjected to the acid etch procedure. The compressive strength of the samples was then calculated in megapascals using a universal testing machine. The results were then subjected to 2-way analysis of variance analysis of variance followed by the Tukey post hoc test. Results The application of acid etch significantly reduced (P <.0001) the compressive strength of Angelus MTA and CEM cement; however, it did not reduce the compressive strength of ProRoot MTA or Biodentine. Regardless of the acid etch application, Biodentine showed significantly higher compressive strength values than the other materials (P <.0001), whereas CEM cement had the lowest compressive strength values. There was no significant difference between CEM cement and MTA Angelus. The compressive strength of ProRoot MTA was significantly lower (P <.0001) than Biodentine but significantly higher (P <.0001) than MTA Angelus and CEM cement in both the test and control groups. Conclusions When the application of acid etchants is required, Biodentine and ProRoot MTA seem to be better options than MTA Angelus or CEM cement.
机译:引言这项研究的目的是评估酸蚀对4种硅酸钙基水泥抗压强度的影响。方法每1克ProRoot MTA(田纳西州约翰逊城的Dentsply Tulsa Dental),MTA Angelus(安吉鲁斯,安德鲁斯,PR,巴西)和CEM水泥(BioniqueDent,伊朗德黑兰),和0.33克等分试样的每种粉末分别为1克。将液体放入塑料混合胶囊中,然后在混合器中以4500 rpm的速度机械混合30秒。为了制备Biodentine(Septodont,法国SaintMaur-des-Fossés),将提供的液体添加到制造商提供的塑料胶囊内的粉末中,然后使用混合器在4500 rpm下机械混合30秒。然后将得到的浆液逐渐放入40个圆柱形模具中,得到总共160个样品,并在37°C下孵育一周。然后将每种材料的20个样品进行酸蚀刻程序。然后使用通用测试仪以兆帕为单位计算样品的抗压强度。然后对结果进行方差的2维分析,然后进行Tukey post hoc检验。结果酸蚀的应用显着降低了Angelus MTA和CEM水泥的抗压强度(P <.0001)。但是,它并没有降低ProRoot MTA或Biodentine的抗压强度。无论使用哪种酸蚀剂,Biodentine的抗压强度值均显着高于其他材料(P <.0001),而CEM水泥的抗压强度值最低。 CEM水泥和MTA Angelus之间没有显着差异。在测试组和对照组中,ProRoot MTA的抗压强度均显着低于Biodentine(P <.0001),但比MTA Angelus和CEM水泥显着更高(P <.0001)。结论当需要使用酸蚀剂时,与MTA Angelus或CEM水泥相比,Biodentine和ProRoot MTA似乎是更好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号