首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Apical Extrusion of Thermoplasticized Obturating Material in Canals Instrumented with Profile 0.06 or Profile GT.
【24h】

Apical Extrusion of Thermoplasticized Obturating Material in Canals Instrumented with Profile 0.06 or Profile GT.

机译:用轮廓0.06或轮廓GT填充的导管中的热塑闭孔材料的根尖挤压。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the extrusion of thermoplacticized gutta-percha in teeth instrumented with Profile 0.06 or Profile GT, and obturated with Thermafil Plus and Thermafil GT, respectively. A total of 120, extracted, human maxillary central incisors were divided into four equal groups. Group 1 was instrumented with Profile 0.06 and obturated with Thermafil Plus. Group 2 was instrumented with Profile 0.06 and obturated using warm vertical condensation (negative control). Group 3 was instrumented with Profile GT and obturated with Thermafil GT. Group 4 was instrumented with Profile GT and obturated like Group 2 (negative control). Extrusion was graded as present or absent. Results found 9 of 30 extruded for group 1, 1 of 30 for group 2, 15 of 30 for group 3, and 2 of 30 for group 4. The results suggest that, in vitro, Thermafil GT may be more prone to extruding gutta-percha past the apical foramen than Thermafil Plus.
机译:这项体外研究的目的是比较分别用Profile 0.06或Profile GT以及用Thermafil Plus和Thermafil GT封闭的热可塑型牙龈胶在牙齿中的挤出。将总共​​120根提取的人类上颌中切牙分为四个相等的组。第1组使用Profile 0.06进行测量,并用Thermafil Plus封闭。第2组使用Profile 0.06进行测量,并使用温暖的垂直冷凝水封闭(阴性对照)。第3组装有Profile GT,并用Thermafil GT封闭。第4组使用Profile GT进行器械治疗,并像第2组一样封闭(阴性对照)。挤出的等级为存在或不存在。结果发现,第1组的30例中有9例挤出,第2组的30例中有1挤出,第3组的30例中有15挤出,第4组的30例中有2挤出。结果表明,Thermafil GT在体外可能更倾向于挤出牙胶。比Thermafil Plus穿透顶端的孔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号