首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >AAE Consensus Conference on Diagnostic Terminology: background and perspectives.
【24h】

AAE Consensus Conference on Diagnostic Terminology: background and perspectives.

机译:AAE诊断术语共识会议:背景和观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Diagnostic terminology in endodontics has been a topic of discussion, controversy, and debate for decades. Confusion in terminology naturally arises when educators, clinicians, and researchers use a wide array of diagnostic diction and schematics; when there are distinct differences in definitions of terms; when key endodontic textbooks promulgate histologically based characterizations for clinically based diagnoses; and when there are strong proponents of specific classification systems. Reasons for these disparities are myriad and multifactorial because diagnosis is already, in its own right, a complex and challenging process. Furthermore, there is a lack of biologically based terms that can represent the true status of the pulp and periapical tissues, poor correlations exist between clinical symptomatology and pulpal histopa-thology, and lack of sophistication with current armamentaria endorses confusion.
机译:数十年来,牙髓病学中的诊断术语一直是讨论,争议和辩论的话题。当教育工作者,临床医生和研究人员使用各种各样的诊断词典和示意图时,自然会引起术语混乱。当术语的定义存在明显差异时;当重要的牙髓教科书颁布基于组织学的特征以进行临床诊断时;以及对特定分类系统的强烈支持者。这些差异的原因是多种多样的,因为诊断本身已经是一个复杂而具有挑战性的过程。此外,缺乏可以代表牙髓和根尖周组织的真实状态的生物学术语,临床症状学和牙髓组织形态学之间的相关性较差,并且由于现有的军械菌属缺乏复杂性,因此难以理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号