首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >A sheathless retrograde approach via the popliteal artery is useful and safe for treating chronic total occlusions in the superficial femoral artery
【24h】

A sheathless retrograde approach via the popliteal artery is useful and safe for treating chronic total occlusions in the superficial femoral artery

机译:通过the动脉进行的无鞘逆行治疗对于治疗股浅动脉的慢性完全闭塞是有用且安全的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the safety and success of a retrograde approach using a microcatheter vs. a sheath in the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Methods: From April 2007 to December 2012, 188 consecutive patients underwent EVT for 229 de novo SFA CTOs using the retrograde approach in 68 patients (35 men; mean age 72 years). This cohort was divided into cases performed with a 4-F or 6-F sheath (n=28, 36 limbs) and those with a 2.1-F microcatheter (n=35, 49 limbs). The primary outcomes were mean time to hemostasis and number of intra- and postoperative puncture site complications, as well as the success of popliteal artery puncture, lesion crossing, and reperfusion. Results: There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline characteristics. PA puncture was successful in all limbs, and the success in crossing the lesion with the wire was not significantly different (91.9% in the sheath group vs. 89.8% in the microcatheter group). Mean time to hemostasis was 8.9±8.8 minutes in the microcatheter group vs. 47.7613 minutes in the sheath group (p <0.0001). There was a significant difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications (22.2% in the sheath group vs. 2.0% in the microcatheter group, p=0.002). Conclusion: Based on this retrospective analysis, the use of a microcatheter for SFA CTO retrograde access appears to be superior to 4-F or 6-F sheaths in terms of shorter time to hemostasis and fewer complications.
机译:目的:比较使用微导管和鞘管逆行方法治疗股浅浅动脉(SFA)慢性总闭塞(CTO)的安全性和成功率。方法:自2007年4月至2012年12月,对68例患者(35名男性,平均年龄72岁),采用逆行方法对188例连续接受229例从头开始的SFA CTO进行EVT。该队列被分为4-F或6-F护套(n = 28,36个肢体)和2.1-F微导管(n = 35,49个肢体)。主要结局为平均止血时间,术中和术后穿刺部位并发症的数量,以及pop动脉穿刺,病变穿刺和再灌注的成功率。结果:两组基线特征无明显差异。 PA穿刺在所有肢体中均成功,并且用金属丝穿过病灶的成功率没有显着差异(鞘管组为91.9%,微导管组为89.8%)。微导管组的平均止血时间为8.9±8.8分钟,而鞘管组为47.7613分钟(p <0.0001)。术中和术后并发症有显着差异(鞘管组为22.2%,微导管组为2.0%,p = 0.002)。结论:基于此回顾性分析,就止血时间较短和并发症少而言,使用微导管进行SFA CTO逆行进入似乎优于4-F或6-F鞘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号