首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >Technical assessment of the preloaded fenestrated stent-graft in the management of pararenal aortic aneurysms
【24h】

Technical assessment of the preloaded fenestrated stent-graft in the management of pararenal aortic aneurysms

机译:预加载开窗支架移植物治疗肾旁主动脉瘤的技术评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of the 20-F preloaded fenestrated stent-graft (FSG) to facilitate safe and quick catheterization of both renal arteries and its impact on relevant procedure variables in the management of pararenal aortic aneurysms (PAAs). Methods: Between June 2012 when preloaded FSG became available in our institution and February 2013, 10 patients (9 men; mean age 70±10 years) with PAAs were treated by the same surgeon with preloaded FSGs consisting of 3 fenestrations with/without a scallop for the celiac trunk. In the same time frame, 12 patients (11 men; mean age 72±8 years) received standard FSGs with the same fenestration configuration by the same surgeon and were considered as controls. The decision to use the standard vs. preloaded FSG was random; no selection criteria were applied. Main outcome measures were the time interval between insertion of the main graft and advancement of sheaths in all target vessels, total operating time, the amount of iodine, the radiation dose area product, and the fluoroscopy time. Results: The median time to sheath introduction into the fenestrations in the preloaded FSG group was significantly shorter (19 minutes, range 15-36) vs. the 48 minutes (range 30-65) of the control group (p=0.001). The mean operating time was 178±28 minutes in test group and 251±50 minutes in the controls (p=0.006). The median fluoroscopy time was shorter in the preloaded FSG group (61 minutes, range 41-73) vs. 83 minutes (range 51-290) in the controls (p=0.002). The radiation dose was significantly lower [3 mGym2 (range 1.4-6.1) vs. 4.9 mGym2 (range 3.6-12.7), p=0.004], as was the amount of iodine (37.4±9.5 g vs. 50±11.7 g, p=0.01). Conclusion: The technique of fenestrated stent-grafting for PAAs using a preloaded device is feasible. Compared to standard FSGs, the preloaded design seems to be beneficial in terms of reducing the times for catheterization of all target vessels (60% shorter), fluoroscopy (27% shorter), and the procedure (29% shorter). The radiation dose and the amount of iodine used were less as well (39% and 25%, respectively).
机译:目的:评估20-F预加载有窗开孔支架移植物(FSG)的有效性,以促进安全快速地将两条肾动脉导管插入及其对相关过程变量在肾旁主动脉瘤(PAA)管理中的影响。方法:从我们机构于2012年6月提供预紧FSG到2013年2月,由同一位外科医生治疗10例PAA患者(9名男性,平均年龄70±10岁),接受预紧FSG的治疗,该预紧FSG包括3个开窗和/或无扇贝用于腹腔干。在同一时间范围内,有12位患者(11名男性;平均年龄72±8岁)由同一位外科医生接受了具有相同开窗配置的标准FSG,并被视为对照。使用标准FGS和预加载FSG的决定是随机的;没有应用选择标准。主要结局指标是在所有目标血管中插入主移植物与护套前进之间的时间间隔,总手术时间,碘量,放射剂量面积乘积和荧光透视时间。结果:预加载的FSG组中,将鞘管引入开窗的中位时间(19分钟,范围15-36)明显短于对照组的48分钟(范围30-65)(p = 0.001)。测试组的平均手术时间为178±28分钟,对照组为251±50分钟(p = 0.006)。预装FSG组的中位透视时间较短(61分钟,范围41-73),而对照组则为83分钟(范围51-290)(p = 0.002)。放射剂量显着降低[3 mGym2(1.4-6.1范围)与4.9 mGym2(3.6-12.7范围),p = 0.004],碘含量也较低(37.4±9.5 g vs. 50±11.7 g,p = 0.01)。结论:采用预加载装置的PAA开窗式支架移植术是可行的。与标准FSG相比,预载设计在减少所有目标血管的置管时间(缩短60%),透视检查(缩短27%)和程序(缩短29%)方面似乎是有益的。辐射剂量和碘的使用量也更少(分别为39%和25%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号