首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Lidocaine-prilocaine administration during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Lidocaine-prilocaine administration during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:经直肠超声引导下的前列腺穿刺活检期间利多卡因-普洛卡因的给药:一项随机,单盲,安慰剂对照的试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As many as 96% of patients report some kind of discomfort/pain during transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy, and when pain is severe, it may be necessary to decrease the planned number of biopsies or interrupt the procedure. Various modalities have been recommended to alleviate the pain, but reports on efficacy are contradictory. We assessed the possible benefit of intrarectal and perianal lidocaine-prilocaine (EMLA) cream. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 98 patients without active anal and prostatic conditions underwent TRUS and, 10 to 31 days later, TRUS-guided biopsy. They were asked to grade their discomfort/pain using a 10- point linear visual analog pain scale (VAS). After TRUS, patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the VAS scores. Group 1 (N = 8) had pain scores or=5 (severe pain/discomfort). Each group was then randomized to receive local anesthesia with intrarectal and anal EMLA cream (subgroup A) or intrarectal and anal ultrasound gel as placebo (subgroup B). Pain scoring was repeated after the biopsy. RESULTS: In group 1, there were no significant differences in pain scores between subgroups A and B. In group 2, we could not complete the biopsy in one patient of subgroup B. A statistically significant difference was noticed between the VAS scores of subgroup A and subgroup B (P < 0.0001). In group 3, we were not able to complete biopsy in 5 patients of subgroup B. We noticed significantly higher VAS scores in subgroup B between TRUS and prostate biopsy (P < 0.0001), whereas similar scores were observed in subgroup A (P = NS). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001) was noticed between subgroup A and subgroup B scores during biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high tolerance for simple TRUS, needle trauma does not significantly alter tolerability, and anesthetic provides little benefit for prostatic biopsy. However, the opposite is true in patients presenting moderate to significant pain/discomfort at TRUS, who may benefit from intrarectal/anal administration of EMLA during prostate biopsy.
机译:背景与目的:多达96%的患者在经直肠超声检查(TRUS)指导的前列腺穿刺活检期间报告某种不适/疼痛,并且当疼痛严重时,可能有必要减少计划的活检次数或中断手术。已经推荐了各种方式来减轻疼痛,但是关于疗效的报道是矛盾的。我们评估了直肠内和肛周利多卡因-普洛卡因(EMLA)乳膏的可能益处。患者和方法:一系列98例无活动肛门和前列腺疾病的患者接受了TRUS手术,并在10到31天后接受了TRUS引导的活检。要求他们使用10分线性视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)对他们的不适/疼痛进行分级。在TRUS后,根据VAS评分将患者分为三组。第1组(N = 8)的疼痛评分<或= 2(轻度疼痛/不适)。第2组(N = 75)的疼痛评分在2至5之间(中度疼痛/不适)。第三组(N = 15)的疼痛评分>或= 5(严重疼痛/不适)。然后将每组随机接受直肠内和肛门EMLA乳膏(A组)或直肠内和肛门超声凝胶作为安慰剂(B组)进行局部麻醉。活检后重复疼痛评分。结果:在第1组中,A和B组之间的疼痛评分无显着差异。在第2组中,我们无法完成B组中一名患者的活检。在A组的VAS评分之间存在统计学上的显着差异和B组(P <0.0001)。在第3组中,我们无法对5个B组患者进行完整的活检。我们注意到TRUS和前列腺活检之间B组的VAS评分显着更高(P <0.0001),而在A组中观察到了相似的评分(P = NS )。活检期间,A组和B组得分之间存在统计学差异(P <0.0001)。结论:在对简单TRUS具有高耐受性的患者中,针头外伤并不会显着改变耐受性,并且麻醉剂对前列腺穿刺活检几乎没有好处。但是,对于在TRUS出现中度至重度疼痛/不适的患者而言,情况恰恰相反,他们可能会在前列腺穿刺活检期间受益于EMLA的直肠/肛门内给药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号