首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: A prospective, randomized study
【24h】

Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: A prospective, randomized study

机译:经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助输尿管镜碎石术治疗大面积近端输尿管结石的临床疗效,安全性和成本:一项前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy (POBC-URSL) for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi. Patients and Methods: 156 patients with impacted proximal ureteral stones ≥1.5 cm in size were randomized to ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL), POBC-URSL, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) group between May 2010 and May 2013. For URSL, the calculi were disintegrated with the assistance of anti-retropulsion devices. POBC-URSL was performed with the assistance of an 8F percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter. PNL was finished with the combination of an ultrasonic and a pneumatic lithotripter. A flexible ureteroscope and a 200 μm laser fiber were used to achieve stone-free status to a large extent for each group. Variables studied were mean operative time, auxiliary procedure, postoperative hospital stay, operation-related complications, stone clearance rate, and treatment costs. Results: The mean lithotripsy time for POBC-URSL was shorter than URSL, but longer than PNL (42.6±8.9 minutes vs 66.7±15.3 minutes vs 28.1±6.3 minutes, p=0.014). The auxiliary procedure rate and postoperative fever rate for POBC-URSL were significantly lower than URSL and comparable to PNL (p<0.01, p=0.034). POBC-URSL was superior to URSL with regard to the stone clearance rate at 3 days postoperatively, and as good as PNL (98.1% vs 75.0% vs 96.2%, p<0.01). The postoperative hospital stay and hematuria rate were lower in POBC-URSL group than PNL group and similar to URSL group (p=0.016, p<0.01). The treatment costs were lowest in POBC-URSL group ($1205.0±$113.9 vs $1731.7±$208.1 vs $2446.4±$166.4, p=0.004). Conclusions: For large impacted proximal ureteral calculi, POBC-URSL was associated with a higher stone clearance rate, fewer complications and costs. POBC-URSL combined the advantages of URSL and PNL.
机译:目的:评估经皮闭塞球囊导管辅助输尿管镜碎石术(POBC-URSL)治疗大面积近端输尿管结石的临床疗效,安全性和成本。患者与方法:在2010年5月至2013年5月之间,将156例受累近端输尿管结石尺寸大于或等于1.5厘米的患者随机分为输尿管镜碎石术(URSL),POBC-URSL和经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)组。在抗排斥装置的帮助下。 POBC-URSL借助8F经皮闭塞球囊导管进行。通过超声波和气动碎石机的组合完成PNL。对于每组,使用柔性输尿管镜和200μm激光纤维在很大程度上实现了无结石状态。研究的变量包括平均手术时间,辅助手术程序,术后住院时间,手术相关并发症,结石清除率和治疗费用。结果:POBC-URSL的平均碎石时间比URSL短,但比PNL长(42.6±8.9分钟vs 66.7±15.3分钟vs 28.1±6.3分钟,p = 0.014)。 POBC-URSL的辅助手术率和术后发烧率显着低于URSL,与PNL相当(p <0.01,p = 0.034)。就术后3天的结石清除率而言,POBC-URSL优于URSL,与PNL一样好(98.1%vs 75.0%vs 96.2%,p <0.01)。 POBC-URSL组的术后住院时间和血尿率低于PNL组,与URSL组相似(p = 0.016,p <0.01)。 POBC-URSL组的治疗费用最低($ 1205.0±$ 113.9 vs $ 1731.7±$ 208.1 vs $ 2446.4±$ 166.4,p = 0.004)。结论:对于受影响较大的近端输尿管结石,POBC-URSL与较高的结石清除率,较少的并发症和成本相关。 POBC-URSL结合了URSL和PNL的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号