首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Comparison between magnetic anchoring and guidance system camera-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in a porcine model: Focus on ergonomics and workload profiles
【24h】

Comparison between magnetic anchoring and guidance system camera-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and conventional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in a porcine model: Focus on ergonomics and workload profiles

机译:猪模型中磁性锚固和引导系统相机辅助腹腔镜内镜单点手术肾切除术与常规腹腔镜内镜单点手术肾切除术的比较:关注人体工程学和工作量概况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare surgeon-assessed ergonomic and workload demands of magnetic anchoring and guidance system (MAGS) laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy with conventional LESS nephrectomy in a porcine model. Methods: Participants included two expert and five novice surgeons who each performed bilateral LESS nephrectomy in two nonsurvival animals using either the MAGS camera or conventional laparoscope. Task difficulty and workload demands of the surgeon and camera driver were assessed using the validated National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire. Surgeons were also asked to score 6 parameters on a Likert scale (range 1=low/easy to 5=high/hard): procedure-associated workload, ergonomics, technical challenge, visualization, accidental events, and instrument handling. Each step of the nephrectomy was also timed and instrument clashing was quantified. Results: Scores for each parameter on the Likert scale were significantly lower for MAGS-LESS nephrectomy. Mean number of internal and external clashes were significantly lower for the MAGS camera (p<0.001). Mean task times for each procedure were shorter for experts than for novices, but this was not statistically significant. NASA-TLX workload ratings by the surgeon and camera driver showed that MAGS resulted in a significantly lower workload than the conventional laparoscope during LESS nephrectomy (p<0.05). Conclusions: The use of the MAGS camera during LESS nephrectomy lowers the task workload for both the surgeon and camera driver when compared to conventional laparoscope use. Subjectively, it appears to also improve surgeons' impressions of ergonomics and technical challenge. Pending approval for clinical use, further evaluation in the clinical setting is warranted.
机译:目的:在猪模型中,比较外科医生评估的磁性锚固和引导系统(MAGS)腹腔镜内镜单点手术(LESS)肾切除术与常规LESS肾切除术的人体工程学和工作量需求。方法:参与者包括两名专家医师和五名新手医师,他们分别使用MAGS摄像头或常规腹腔镜在两只非存活动物中进行了双侧LESS肾切除术。使用经过验证的美国国家航空和航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)问卷评估了外科医生和摄像机驾驶员的任务难度和工作量需求。还要求外科医生在李克特量表上为6个参数评分(范围1 =低/容易至5 =高/困难):与手术相关的工作量,人体工程学,技术挑战,可视化,意外事件和仪器处理。还对肾切除术的每个步骤进行计时,并对器械的碰撞进行量化。结果:MAGS-LESS肾切除术在李克特量表上的每个参数得分均明显较低。 MAGS摄像机的内部和外部冲突的平均次数显着降低(p <0.001)。对于专家来说,每个程序的平均任务时间比新手要短,但这在统计上并不重要。外科医生和摄像头驾驶员对NASA-TLX进行的工作量评估表明,LESS肾切除术期间,MAGS导致的工作量显着低于传统的腹腔镜(p <0.05)。结论:与传统的腹腔镜相比,在LESS肾切除术中使用MAGS摄像机可以减少外科医生和摄像机驾驶员的工作量。从主观上讲,它似乎也改善了外科医生对人机工程学和技术挑战的印象。在等待临床使用批准之前,有必要在临床环境中进行进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号