首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Entomology >Effectiveness of commercial and experimental termite monitors for the desert subterranean termite Heterotermes aureus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Southern Arizona
【24h】

Effectiveness of commercial and experimental termite monitors for the desert subterranean termite Heterotermes aureus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in Southern Arizona

机译:商业和实验性白蚁监测器对亚利桑那州南部沙漠地下白蚁金刚鹦鹉(等翅目:犀牛科)的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Arizona, the subterranean termite Heterotermes aureus (Snyder) (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) is the most economically important termite pest. We report here the evaluation of several commercial and experimental monitoring stations to capture and monitor H. aureus. In total, 12 monitoring stations were evaluated over two study periods. In 2001-2002, the commercial monitors Firstline and Termicon did not capture any H. aureus, whereas Termitrol did not capture significantly more termites than these two monitors. In contrast, three experimental Arizona Research Monitoring Stations (ARMS)-ARMS-PINE, ARMS-ASH, and ARMS-BBT-captured significantly more termites than Firstline and Termicon, and ARMS-BBT captured termites significantly more frequently than the commercial monitors. Similarly in 2003, the commercial monitors Firstline and Defender did not capture any H. aureus, whereas Extera did not capture significantly more termites than these two monitors. However, four monitor designs including the three most successful ARMS in 2001-2002 captured significantly more termites than Firstline and Defender, and ARMS-ASH captured termites significantly more often than the commercial monitors. On-ground ARMS monitors in general captured significantly more termites than commercial in-ground stations.
机译:在亚利桑那州,地下白蚁金黄色Heterotermes aureus(Snyder)(等翅目:Rhinotermitidae)是最经济重要的白蚁害虫。我们在这里报告了对几个商业和实验监测站的评估,以捕获和监测金黄色葡萄球菌。在两个研究期内,总共对12个监测站进行了评估。在2001-2002年期间,商用监测器Firstline和Termicon没有捕获任何金黄色葡萄球菌,而Termitrol捕获的白蚁没有比这两个监测器多得多。相比之下,三个实验性亚利桑那研究监测站(ARMS)-ARMS-PINE,ARMS-ASH和ARMS-BBT捕获的白蚁比Firstline和Termicon捕获的白蚁明显多,而ARMS-BBT捕获白蚁的频率比商业监测器高得多。同样,在2003年,商业监测器Firstline和Defender没有捕获任何金黄色葡萄球菌,而Extera捕获的白蚁没有比这两个监测器多得多。但是,包括2001年至2002年三个最成功的ARMS在内的四种监视器设计捕获的白蚁数量明显多于Firstline和Defender,而ARMS-ASH捕获白蚁的频率则明显高于商用监视器。一般而言,地面ARMS监控器捕获的白蚁数量比商业地面站要多得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号