...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association >Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage guidelines for the identification of major trauma in elderly motor vehicle crash victims.
【24h】

Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage guidelines for the identification of major trauma in elderly motor vehicle crash victims.

机译:院前创伤分诊指南在识别老年机动车碰撞受害者中主要创伤方面的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Undertriage of older trauma victims has been a persistent and serious problem. Because of physiologic changes and pre-existing disease, blunt trauma in older persons is often covert. Prehospital trauma triage guidelines developed for use with a general adult population may not be sensitive enough to detect covert injuries in elderly trauma patients. This study examined the sensitivity and specificity of one state's prehospital trauma triage guidelines for adults, with a particular focus on the triage of elderly persons. METHODS: This retrospective study used patient discharge data to examine the sensitivity (a measure of undertriage) and specificity (a measure of overtriage) of the adult prehospital trauma triage guidelines in 3 counties with level I trauma centers. Sensitivity and specificity of young and middle-aged adults was compared with that of older adults. RESULTS: Undertriage was 8% for young and middle-aged men, 12% for young and middle-aged women, 18% for older men, and 15% forolder women. Overtriage was present in all age groups, indicating that many motor vehicle crash victims who were admitted to trauma centers could have been admitted to nontrauma center hospitals. DISCUSSION: Low sensitivity and specificity of trauma triage guidelines results in undertriage and overtriage. These guidelines should include age as a decision point to avoid placing older persons at risk for undertriage. Although some degree of overtriage is unavoidable without increasing undertriage, efforts should be made to minimize this costly occurrence.
机译:简介:老年创伤受害者的未成年人生活是一个长期存在的严重问题。由于生理变化和先前存在的疾病,老年人的钝性创伤通常是秘密的。为一般成年人制定的院前创伤分诊指南可能不够灵敏,无法检测出老年创伤患者的隐性损伤。这项研究检查了一个州对成年人进行院前创伤分诊指南的敏感性和特异性,尤其侧重于老年人的分诊。方法:这项回顾性研究使用患者出院数据检查了3个县一级I级创伤中心的成人院前创伤分诊指南的敏感性(不足分类)和特异性(过度分类)。比较了年轻人和中年成年人的敏感性和特异性。结果:年轻和中年男性的未婚率是8%,年轻和中年女性的是12%,老年男性是18%,老年女性是15%。在所有年龄段中都存在过分流失现象,这表明许多进入创伤中心的机动车撞车受害者可能已经被非创伤中心医院收治。讨论:创伤分类指南的敏感性和特异性低,导致分类不足和分类过多。这些准则应将年龄作为决策点,以避免使老年人处于未成年人分类的风险中。尽管在不增加未分类数的情况下不可避免地会出现某种程度的重复分类,但是应尽力减少这种代价高昂的事件的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号