...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Adherence to and gastrointestinal tolerability of monthly oral or quarterly intravenous ibandronate therapy in women with previous intolerance to oral bisphosphonates: a 12-month, open-label, prospective evaluation.
【24h】

Adherence to and gastrointestinal tolerability of monthly oral or quarterly intravenous ibandronate therapy in women with previous intolerance to oral bisphosphonates: a 12-month, open-label, prospective evaluation.

机译:对先前对口服双膦酸盐不耐受的女性,每月口服或每季度静脉使用伊班膦酸治疗的依从性和胃肠道耐受性:一项为期12个月的开放性前瞻性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and high dosing frequency have been cited as reasons for inadequate adherence to daily or weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy. Inadequate adherence may lead to poor therapeutic outcomes. Objective: The PRIOR study evaluated adherence to and GI tolerability of monthly therapy with oral and quarterly intravenous ibandronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia. Methods: This 12-month, multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, noninferiority study included postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia who had discontinued previous daily or weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy because of GI intolerance. Participants chose to receive either monthly oral ibandronate 150 mg or quarterly intravenous ibandronate 3 mg and were permitted to switch formulations once during the study. For oral treatment, adherence was assessed based on doses taken, as recorded on the case-report form; for intravenous treatment, adherence was assessed basedon doses administered, as recorded by study site personnel. Participants who took >/=75% of protocol-specified doses were considered adherent. The rate of adherence to oral ibandronate was protocol defined as noninferior to that of intravenous ibandronate if the upper limit of the 2-sided 90% CI for the adjusted difference in adherence rates was >20%. At screening, participants assessed the tolerability of their previous bisphosphonate therapy using the GI Experience Survey; using the same instrument, they assessed the tolerability of ibandronate 1 month from baseline and at months 4, 7, and 10. Results: Of 543 participants in the intent-to-treat population, 147 (27.1%) chose to receive oral treatment and 396 (72.9%) chose to receive intravenous treatment. The mean age of participants was <66 years in both groups, and >90% of participants were white. A significantly greater proportion of participants who selected intravenous versus oral treatment had a primary diagnosis of osteoporosis (72.2% vs 57.1%, respectively; P < 0.001) and a history of fracture as an adult (35.6% vs 22.4%; P >/= 0.004); significantly fewer recipients of intravenous versus oral ibandronate were currently working (29.0% vs 39.5%; P >/= 0.021). Overall, 82.9% of participants had previously received alendronate and 44.9% had previously received risedronate. Eleven participants switched from oral to intravenous therapy and 16 switched from intravenous to oral therapy during the study. In the perprotocol population, 69.7% of participants in the oral group (101/145) and 82.9% of participants in the intravenous group (325/392) were adherent to their originally selected therapy. Adherence to oral therapy fell within the prespecified boundary for noninferiority to intravenous therapy (adjusted difference: 12.4%; 90% CI, 5.1-19.7). Mean GI tolerance scores were significantly improved from screening at all subsequent assessment times in both treatment groups (P < 0.001); >75% of participants had a >/=10% increase in GI tolerability scores from screening. Both dosing regimens were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Self-selected monthly oral or quarterly intravenous ibandronate therapy was associated with high adherence rates among these postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia who had previously discontinued oral bisphosphonate treatment because of GI intolerance.
机译:背景:胃肠道(GI)症状和高给药频率被认为是每天或每周口服双膦酸盐治疗依从性不足的原因。依从性不足可能导致治疗效果差。目的:PRIOR研究评估了绝经后骨质疏松症或骨质疏松症妇女每月口服和每季度静脉注射伊班膦酸的依从性和胃肠道耐受性。方法:这项为期12个月的多中心,前瞻性,非随机,开放标签,非劣势性研究包括绝经后患有骨质疏松症或骨质减少症的妇女,这些妇女由于胃肠道耐受不良而中断了以前的每日或每周口服双膦酸盐治疗。参与者选择每月口服伊班膦酸150 mg或每季度口服伊班膦酸3 mg,并且在研究期间允许一次更换配方。对于口服治疗,根据病例报告表中记录的剂量评估依从性;对于静脉内治疗,根据研究地点人员记录的给药剂量评估依从性。服用协议规定剂量的> / = 75%的参与者被认为是依从性的。如果经调整的依从性差异的2面90%CI的上限大于20%,则对口服伊班膦酸的依从率定义为不逊于静脉内伊班膦酸。进行筛选时,参与者使用GI经验调查评估了他们以前的双膦酸盐治疗的耐受性。他们使用相同的仪器评估了伊班膦酸从基线开始1个月以及在第4、7和10个月的耐受性。结果:在意向性治疗人群中的543名参与者中,有147名(27.1%)选择接受口服治疗, 396(72.9%)选择接受静脉治疗。两组的参与者平均年龄<66岁,并且> 90%的参与者为白人。选择静脉内治疗与口服治疗的参与者中,有更大比例的患者具有骨质疏松的初步诊断(分别为72.2%和57.1%; P <0.001)和成人骨折史(35.6%对22.4%; P> / = 0.004);目前正在工作的静脉注射伊班膦酸与口服伊班膦酸的接受者明显减少(29.0%比39.5%; P> / = 0.021)。总体而言,82.9%的参与者先前曾接受过阿仑膦酸钠,44.9%的参与者先前曾接受过阿仑膦酸钠。在研究过程中,有11名参与者从口服疗法改为静脉疗法,而16名从静脉疗法改为口服疗法。在按协议人群中,口服组(101/145)的参与者为69.7%,静脉内组(325/392)的参与者为82.9%坚持其最初选择的疗法。对口服治疗的依从性属于非劣于静脉治疗的预定范围(调整差:12.4%; 90%CI,5.1-19.7)。两个治疗组在所有随后的评估时间进行筛查,平均GI耐受性评分均得到显着改善(P <0.001);超过75%的参与者通过筛查获得的GI耐受性评分增加了> / = 10%。两种给药方案通常耐受良好。结论:在绝经后骨质疏松或骨质减少的女性中,由于胃肠道不耐受而停止口服双膦酸盐治疗的患者,自选每月口服或每季度静脉注射伊班膦酸治疗与依从性高相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号