...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Hemolysis rates in blood samples: differences between blood collected by clinicians and nurses and the effect of phlebotomy training
【24h】

Hemolysis rates in blood samples: differences between blood collected by clinicians and nurses and the effect of phlebotomy training

机译:血液样本中的溶血率:临床医生和护士采集的血液之间的差异以及放血训练的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Hemolytic samples are one of the most challenging preanalytical issues in laboratory medicine. Even causes leading to hemolytic specimen are various, including phlebotomy practices. Respective educational interventions as well as the reduction of the number of people involved in blood collections are claimed to influence the sample quality for the better. In our hospital 70 junior doctors were in charge of routine phlebotomy until 2012, when this task was shifted to 874 nurses, including a preceding training in phlebotomy and preanalytics. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of this training effect and the increase of people involved on sample quality.
机译:背景:溶血样品是实验室医学中最具挑战性的分析前问题之一。甚至导致溶血标本的原因也多种多样,包括静脉切开术。据称,相应的教育干预措施以及减少采血工作的人数会更好地影响样本质量。在我们医院,有70位初级医生负责常规静脉放血,直到2012年,该任务转移到874名护士,其中包括先前的静脉放血和分析前培训。我们的目的是评估这种培训效果的影响以及参与样本质量增加的人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号