首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied microbiology >Do bacteria need to be regulated?
【24h】

Do bacteria need to be regulated?

机译:是否需要调节细菌?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Additives for use in animal nutrition are regulated under Regulation (EC) No. 1831/2003. The scope of this paper addresses the specific microbiological issues relevant to a microbial feed additive, containing a Bacillus spp. and uses as an example a product with the trade name, Calsporin (R). Bacillus subtilis C-3102 is the active ingredient in Calsporin (R) and is added to animal feed to favourably affect animal production and performance (growth and feed efficiency), by modulating the gastrointestinal flora. It is not the purpose of this review to present the raw data for Calsporin (R) but rather to use Calsporin (R) as an example of the type of data required by the European regulatory authorities. At the time of preparation of this manuscript Calsporin (R) has yet to be reviewed by the authorities. The regulatory system under the auspices of the EFSA FEEDAP Panel is clearly attempting to move in line with development of scientific opinion and is to be applauded for such efforts. Bacteria do need to be regulated, and the regulations clearly provide adequate and appropriate protection to human health and to environmental considerations.
机译:用于动物营养的添加剂受法规(EC)第1831/2003号的管制。本文的范围解决了与含有芽孢杆菌属的微生物饲料添加剂有关的特定微生物问题。并以商品名为Calsporin(R)的产品为例。枯草芽孢杆菌C-3102是Calsporin(R)中的活性成分,可通过调节胃肠道菌群而添加到动物饲料中,以有利地影响动物的生产和性能(生长和饲料效率)。本文的目的不是提供Calsporin(R)的原始数据,而是以Calsporin(R)作为欧洲监管机构要求的数据类型的示例。在编写此手稿时,当局尚未对Calsporin(R)进行审查。在EFSA FEEDAP小组主持下的监管体系显然正在努力与科学观点的发展保持一致,并为此而受到赞扬。确实需要对细菌进行监管,并且这些法规显然为人类健康和环境考虑提供了充分和适当的保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号