...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied microbiology >Analysis of the action of compounds that inhibit the germination of spores of Bacillus species
【24h】

Analysis of the action of compounds that inhibit the germination of spores of Bacillus species

机译:分析化合物抑制芽孢杆菌种芽孢的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aims: To determine the mechanism of action of inhibitors of the germination of spores of Bacillus species, and where these inhibitors act in the germination process.Methods and Results: Spores of various Bacillus species are significant agents of food spoilage and food-borne disease, and inhibition of spore germination is a potential means of reducing such problems. Germination of the following spores was studied: (i) wild-type B. subtilis spores; (ii) B. subtilis spores with a nutrient receptor variant allowing recognition of a novel germinant; (iii) B. subtilis spores with elevated levels of either the variant nutrient receptor or its wild-type allele; (iv) B. subtilis spores lacking all nutrient receptors and (v) wild-type B. megaterium spores. Spores were germinated with a variety of nutrient germinants, Ca2+-dipicolinic acid (DPA) and dodecylamine for B. subtilis spores, and KBr for B. megaterium spores. Compounds tested as inhibitors of germination included alkyl alcohols, a phenol derivative, a fatty acid, ion channel blockers, enzyme inhibitors and several other compounds. Assays used to assess rates of spore germination monitored: (i) the fall in optical density at 600 nm of spore suspensions; (ii) the release of the dormant spore's large depot of DPA; (iii) hydrolysis of the dormant spore's peptidoglycan cortex and (iv) generation of CFU from spores that lacked all nutrient receptors. The results with B. subtilis spores allowed the assignment of inhibitory compounds into two general groups: (i) those that inhibited the action of, or response to, one nutrient receptor and (ii) those that blocked the action of, or response to, several or all of the nutrient receptors. Some of the compounds in groups 1 and 2 also blocked action of at least one cortex lytic enzyme, however, this does not appear to be the primary site of their action in inhibiting spore germination. The inhibitors had rather different effects on germination of B. subtilis spores with nutrients or non-nutrients, consistent with previous work indicating that germination of B. subtilis spores by non-nutrients does not involve the spore's nutrient receptors. In particular, none of the compounds tested inhibited spore germination with dodecylamine, and only three compounds inhibited Ca~(2+)-DPA germination. In contrast, all compounds had very similar effects on the germination of B. megaterium spores with either glucose or KBr. The effects of the inhibitors tested on spores of both Bacillus species were largely reversible. Conclusions: This work indicates that inhibitors of B. subtilis spore germination fall into two classes: (i) compounds (most alkyl alcohols, N-ethylmaleimide, nifedipine, phenols, potassium sorbate) that inhibit the action of, or response to, primarily one nutrient receptor and (ii) compounds [amiloride, HgCl_2, octanoic acid, octanol, phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride (PMSF), quinine, tetracaine, tosyl-l-arginine methyl ester, trifluoperazine] that inhibit the action of, or response to, several nutrient receptors. Action of these inhibitors, is reversible. The similar effects of inhibitors on B. megaterium spore germination by glucose or KBr indicate that inorganic salts likely trigger germination by activating one or more nutrient receptors. The lack of effect of all inhibitors on dodecylamine germination suggests that this compound stimulates germination by creating channels in the spore's inner membrane allowing DPA release. Significance and Impact of the Study: This work provides new insight into the steps in spore germination that are inhibited by various chemicals, and the mechanism of action of these inhibitors. The work also provides new insights into the process of spore germination itself.
机译:目的:确定芽孢杆菌属孢子发芽抑制剂的作用机理,以及这些抑制剂在发芽过程中的作用。方法和结果:各种芽孢杆菌属的孢子是导致食物腐败和食源性疾病的重要因素,抑制孢子萌发是减少此类问题的潜在手段。研究了以下孢子的萌发:(i)野生型枯草芽孢杆菌孢子; (ii)带有营养受体变异体的枯草芽孢杆菌孢子,可识别新型发芽剂; (iii)变异营养素受体或其野生型等位基因水平升高的枯草芽孢杆菌孢子; (iv)缺乏所有营养受体的枯草芽孢杆菌孢子;以及(v)野生型巨大芽孢杆菌孢子。枯草芽孢杆菌孢子用各种营养发芽剂,Ca2 +-二吡啶甲酸(DPA)和十二烷基胺萌发,而巨大芽孢杆菌孢子用KBr萌发。作为发芽抑制剂测试的化合物包括烷基醇,酚衍生物,脂肪酸,离子通道阻滞剂,酶抑制剂和其他几种化合物。用于评估所监测的孢子萌发速率的测定:(i)孢子悬浮液在600 nm处的光密度下降; (ii)释放休眠孢子的DPA大仓库; (iii)休眠孢子的肽聚糖皮质的水解和(iv)从缺乏所有营养受体的孢子中产生CFU。枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的结果可将抑制性化合物分为两大类:(i)抑制一种营养受体的作用或对一种营养物受体的反应的化合物;(ii)阻断一种营养物受体的作用或反应的化合物。几种或全部营养素受体。第1组和第2组中的某些化合物还阻断了至少一种皮质溶解酶的作用,但是,这似乎不是其抑制孢子萌发的主要作用部位。抑制剂对枯草芽孢杆菌孢子萌发的影响与养分或非养分的影响相当不同,这与以前的工作一致,表明枯草芽孢杆菌孢子通过非养分发芽并不涉及孢子的养分受体。特别地,所测试的化合物均未抑制十二烷基胺引起的孢子萌发,仅三种化合物抑制了Ca〜(2 +)-DPA萌发。相反,所有化合物对具有葡萄糖或KBr的巨大芽孢杆菌孢子的萌发具有非常相似的作用。测试的抑制剂对两种芽孢杆菌属孢子的作用在很大程度上是可逆的。结论:这项工作表明枯草芽孢杆菌孢子萌发抑制剂可分为两类:(i)抑制(主要是对一种)作用或响应的化合物(大多数烷基醇,N-乙基马来酰亚胺,硝苯地平,酚,山梨酸钾)。营养受体和(ii)抑制几种营养受体的作用或对它们的反应的化合物[阿米洛利,HgCl_2,辛酸,辛醇,苯甲基磺酰氟(PMSF),奎宁,丁卡因,甲苯磺酰基-1-精氨酸甲酯,三氟拉嗪]。这些抑制剂的作用是可逆的。抑制剂对葡萄糖或KBr对巨大芽孢杆菌孢子萌发的类似作用表明,无机盐可能通过激活一种或多种营养受体来触发萌发。所有抑制剂对十二烷基胺萌发的影响均不足,表明该化合物通过在孢子内膜上形成允许DPA释放的通道来刺激发芽。研究的意义和影响:这项工作为孢子萌发中受各种化学物质抑制的步骤以及这些抑制剂的作用机理提供了新的见解。这项工作还为孢子萌发过程提供了新的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号