首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Chemistry: Journal of the American Association for Clinical Chemists >Association of apolipoprotein B and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-derived LDL particle number with outcomes in 25 clinical studies: Assessment by the AACC lipoprotein and Vascular Diseases Division Working Group on Best Practices
【24h】

Association of apolipoprotein B and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-derived LDL particle number with outcomes in 25 clinical studies: Assessment by the AACC lipoprotein and Vascular Diseases Division Working Group on Best Practices

机译:载脂蛋白B和核磁共振波谱分析得出的LDL颗粒数量与25项临床研究结果的关联:AACC脂蛋白和血管疾病科最佳实践工作组的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The number of circulating LDL particles is a strong indicator of future cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, even superior to the concentration of LDL cholesterol. Atherogenic (primarily LDL) particle number is typically determined either directly by the serum concentration of apolipoprotein B (apo B) or indirectly by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of serum to obtain NMR-derived LDL particle number (LDL-P). CONTENT: To assess the comparability of apo B and LDL-P, we reviewed 25 clinical studies containing 85 outcomes for which both biomarkers were determined. In 21 of 25 (84.0%) studies, both apo B and LDL-P were significant for at least 1 outcome. Neither was significant for any outcome in only 1 study (4.0%). In 50 of 85 comparisons (58.8%), both apo B and LDL-P had statistically significant associations with the clinical outcome, whereas in 17 comparisons (20.0%) neither was significantly associated with the outcome. In 18 comparisons (21.1%) there was discordance between apo B and LDL-P. CONCLUSIONS: In most studies, both apo B and LDL-P were comparable in association with clinical outcomes. The biomarkers were nearly equivalent in their ability to assess risk for CVD and both have consistently been shown to be stronger risk factors than LDL-C. We support the adoption of apo B and/or LDL-P as indicators of atherogenic particle numbers into CVD risk screening and treatment guidelines. Currently, in the opinion of this Working Group on Best Practices, apo B appears to be the preferable biomarker for guideline adoption because of its availability, scalability, standardization, and relatively low cost.
机译:背景:循环中的LDL颗粒数量是未来心血管疾病(CVD)事件的有力指标,甚至优于LDL胆固醇的浓度。通常由载脂蛋白B(apo B)的血清浓度直接确定或由血清的核磁共振(NMR)光谱间接确定产生致热(主要是LDL)的颗粒数,以获得NMR衍生的LDL颗粒数(LDL-P)。内容:为了评估载脂蛋白B和LDL-P的可比性,我们回顾了25个临床研究,其中包含85个结果,并确定了两种生物标志物。在25个研究中的21个(84.0%)中,载脂蛋白B和LDL-P均对至少1个结局具有显着意义。仅一项研究(4.0%)对任何结果均无显着意义。在85个比较中的50个(58.8%)中,载脂蛋白B和LDL-P两者均与临床结局具有统计学上的显着相关性,而在17个比较中(20.0%),两者均与该结果没有显着相关性。在18个比较中(21.1%),载脂蛋白B和LDL-P之间不一致。结论:在大多数研究中,载脂蛋白B和LDL-P在临床结局方面均具有可比性。这些生物标记物在评估CVD风险的能力上几乎相等,并且始终被证明比LDL-C更强。我们支持在心血管疾病风险筛查和治疗指南中采用载脂蛋白B和/或LDL-P作为动脉粥样硬化颗粒数的指标。目前,该最佳实践工作组认为,载脂蛋白B由于其可用性,可扩展性,标准化和相对较低的成本,似乎是指南采用的首选生物标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号