...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology >Reconciling Ground-Based and Space-Based Estimates of the Frequency of Occurrence and Radiative Effect of Clouds around Darwin, Australia
【24h】

Reconciling Ground-Based and Space-Based Estimates of the Frequency of Occurrence and Radiative Effect of Clouds around Darwin, Australia

机译:协调澳大利亚达尔文市周围云的发生频率和辐射效应的地面和空间估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this paper is to investigate whether estimates of the cloud frequency of occurrence and associated cloud radiative forcing as derived from ground-based and satellite active remote sensing and radiative transfer calculations can be reconciled over a well-instrumented active remote sensing site located in Darwin, Australia, despite the very different viewing geometry and instrument characteristics. It is found that the ground-based radar-lidar combination at Darwin does not detect mostof the cirrus clouds above 10 km (because of limited lidar detection capability and signal obscuration by low-level clouds) and that the CloudSat radar-Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) combination underreports the hydrometeor frequency of occurrence below 2-km height because of instrument limitations at these heights. The radiative impact associated with these differences in cloud frequency of occurrence is large on the surface downwelling shortwave fluxes (ground and satellite) and the top-of-atmosphere upwelling shortwave and longwave fluxes (ground). Good agreement is found for other radiative fluxes. Large differences in radiative heating rate as derived from ground and satellite radar-lidar instruments and radiative transfer calculations are also found above 10 km (up to 0.35 k day-1 for the shortwave and 0.8 k day-1 for the longwave). Given that the ground-based and satellite estimates of cloud frequency of occurrence and radiative impact cannot be fully reconciled overDarwin, caution should be exercised when evaluating the representation of clouds and cloud-radiation interactions in large-scale models, and limitations of each set of instrumentation should be considered when interpreting model-observation differences.
机译:本文的目的是研究是否可以在位于加利福尼亚州的仪器齐全的有源遥感站点上,对从地面和卫星有源遥感以及辐射转移计算得出的云出现频率和相关云辐射强迫的估计值进行核对。尽管达尔文的观看几何形状和乐器特性大不相同,但它还是澳大利亚的达尔文。发现达尔文的地面雷达-激光雷达组合无法检测到10 km以上的大部分卷云(由于有限的激光雷达检测能力和低层云对信号的遮挡),而CloudSat雷达-云-气溶胶激光雷达正交极化(CALIOP)结合使用时,由于在这些高度处的仪器限制,未充分报告水汽流星发生在2 km以下的频率。与这些云的出现频率差异相关的辐射影响对地面下行的短波通量(地面和卫星)和大气层上方的短波和长波通量(地面)产生很大的影响。对于其他辐射通量,发现有很好的一致性。从地面和卫星雷达-激光雷达仪器和辐射传输计算得出的辐射加热速率也存在较大差异(10 km以上(短波为0.35 k day-1,长波为0.8 k day-1))。鉴于在达尔文上无法完全协调地面和卫星对云的发生频率和辐射影响的估计,因此在评估大型模型中云的表示形式和云与辐射的相互作用以及每一组的局限性时应谨慎行事。解释模型观测差异时应考虑使用仪器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号