首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Retrospective study of the renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex when used at higher-than-recommended dosages and longer durations compared with lower dosages and shorter durations in patients with systemic fungal infections.
【24h】

Retrospective study of the renal effects of amphotericin B lipid complex when used at higher-than-recommended dosages and longer durations compared with lower dosages and shorter durations in patients with systemic fungal infections.

机译:回顾性研究两性霉素B脂质复合物在系统性真菌感染患者中以高于推荐的剂量和更长的持续时间与更低的剂量和更短的持续时间相比时的肾脏作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients with fungal infections who are treated with amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) often receive dosages less than that recommended in the product information (5 mg/kg.d). This occurs despite the described safety and increased efficacy in select patients treated with higher ABLC dosages. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the renal effects of high-dosage/long-duration (HDos/LDur) ABLC therapy (>5 mg/kg.d for >12 days) with those of low-dosage/short-duration (LDos/SDur) ABLC therapy (or=4 ABLC doses according to a large, multicenter patient database, the Collaborative Exchange of Antifungal Research (CLEAR) registry. The safety profile of each dosage was evaluated using serum creatinine concentration (S-Cr) and calculated creatinine clearance (CCcr). RESULTS: A total of 1726 patients were studied. The HDos/LDur group included 309 patients and theLDos/SDur group included 1417 patients. The median ages of the HDos/LDur and LDos/SDur groups were 42 and 48 years, respectively (ranges, <1 to 83 and <1 to 95 years; P < 0.001); females comprised 51% and 42% of the 2 populations (P = 0.004); and 6% and 12% had solid tumors (P = 0.002). The HDos/LDur group was more likely than the LDos/SDur group to have been treated for multiple systemic fungal pathogen infections (16% and 9%, respectively) and for mold infections (28% and 12%, respectively) (both, P < 0.001). The median change in S-Cr from baseline was 0.1 mg/dL in both groups (range, -4.9 to 5 mg/dL in the HDos/LDur group and -3.96 to 4.7 mg/dL in the LDos/SDur group). No increased risk for renal dysfunction, as reflected in the median change from baseline in CCcr, was observed in either cohort (-3 mL/min [range, -118.65 to 69.03 mL/min] in the HDos/LDur group; -2.17 mL/min [range, -107.48 to 104.45 mL/min] in the LDos/SDur group). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that higher ABLC dosages appear to be as well tolerated as lower dosages, warranting further study of ABLC dosages >5 mg/kg.d for >12 days in the treatment of systemic fungal infections.
机译:背景:使用两性霉素B脂质复合物(ABLC)治疗的真菌感染患者的剂量通常低于产品信息中推荐的剂量(5 mg / kg.d)。尽管在使用较高ABLC剂量治疗的部分患者中描述了安全性并提高了疗效,但仍会发生这种情况。目的:本研究的目的是比较高剂量/长效(HDos / LDur)ABLC治疗(> 5 mg / kg.d持续> 12天)与低剂量/短时持续时间(LDos / SDur)ABLC治疗(<或= 5 mg / kg.d,<或= 12天)。方法:前瞻性地招募了各个年龄段的男性和女性接受ABLC治疗的患者,并根据一个大型的多中心患者数据库,抗真菌研究合作交流中心(CLEAR)回顾性收集了≥4个ABLC剂量的患者的数据。注册表。使用血清肌酐浓度(S-Cr)和计算的肌酐清除率(CCcr)评估每种剂量的安全性。结果:共研究了1726例患者。 HDos / LDur组包括309例患者,LDos / SDur组包括1417例患者。 HDos / LDur和LDos / SDur组的中位年龄分别为42岁和48岁(范围:<1至83岁和<1至95岁; P <0.001);女性在这两个人群中分别占51%和42%(P = 0.004);分别有6%和12%的实体瘤(P = 0.002)。 HDos / LDur组比LDos / SDur组更有可能接受多种全身性真菌病原体感染(分别为16%和9%)和霉菌感染(分别为28%和12%)的治疗(两者均为P <0.001)。两组中S-Cr相对于基线的中位变化为0.1 mg / dL(HDos / LDur组为-4.9至5 mg / dL,LDos / SDur组为-3.96至4.7 mg / dL)。在两个队列中(HDos / LDur组为-3 mL / min [范围:-118.65至69.03 mL / min]; -2.17 mL),均未观察到肾功能不全的风险增加,如CCcr相对于基线的中位变化所反映。 / min [LDos / SDur组中的范围-107.48至104.45 mL / min]。结论:这些数据表明较高的ABLC剂量似乎与较低的剂量一样耐受,因此有必要进一步研究ABLC剂量> 5 mg / kg.d在系统性真菌感染中治疗12天以上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号