...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Associations between prescription copayment levels and beta-blocker medication adherence in commercially insured heart failure patients 50 years and older.
【24h】

Associations between prescription copayment levels and beta-blocker medication adherence in commercially insured heart failure patients 50 years and older.

机译:在商业保险的50岁及以上的心力衰竭患者中,处方药共付水平和β受体阻滞剂药物依从性之间的关联。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: High prescription copayments may create barriers to care, resulting in medication nonadherence. Although many studies have examined these associations in commercially insured patients with chronic disease, few have examined beta-blocker effects in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVE: Associations between beta-blocker prescription copayment levels and medication nonadherence were examined within commercially insured beneficiaries with a diagnosis of heart failure. METHODS: Heart failure patients were identified as those with at least 1 inpatient claim or 2 outpatient claims with an associated International Classification of Diagnosis, 9th Edition (ICD-9) code of 428.x, in addition to those with at least 2 beta-blocker claims. Copayment levels were defined in using Dollars 5.00 (USD) interval categories, and adherence was defined using the medication possession ratio (MPR). Ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects (FE), and random effect (RE) models were used to estimate associations between copayment level and MPR. Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of nonadherence (MPR < 0.80) conditional upon copayment level. Regressions controlled for patient demographics, health status, prior hospitalizations, and concomitant medication use. RESULTS: The highest beta-blocker copayment level (Dollars 26+) had an average MPR that was 0.07 (95% CI, -0.11 to -0.03), 0.08 (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.04), and 0.09 (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.02) units lower than beta-blocker copayment level (Dollars 0 to Dollars 1) in the OLS, RE, and FE models, respectively. Copayment levels Dollars 21-Dollars 25 and Dollars 26+ were significantly associated with an increased risk of medication nonadherence (OR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4; and OR = 2.5; 95%, CI 1.6-4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Commercially insured heart failure patients aged >/=50 years who are prescribed higher costing beta-blockers may have up to an average 9% decrease in annual beta-blocker medication supply as well as an increased risk of nonadherence (MPR <0.80). Results need to be interpreted with caution given the potential of selection bias due to selective prescribing. Associations between copayment levels and nonadherence need to be further explored given the adverse health consequences of nonadherence to beta-blockers.
机译:背景:较高的处方共付额可能会造成护理障碍,导致药物不依从。尽管许多研究已经在商业保险的慢性疾病患者中检查了这些关联,但是很少研究了心力衰竭患者中的​​β受体阻滞剂作用。目的:在商业上有保险且心力衰竭的受益人中检查β受体阻滞剂处方共付额水平与药物不依从性之间的关联。方法:将心力衰竭患者确定为至少有1例住院索赔或2例门诊索赔,且相关国际诊断分类,第9版(ICD-9)代码为428.x,此外还有至少2个beta-阻止者索赔。使用5.00美元(USD)间隔类别定义共付额水平,使用药物拥有率(MPR)定义依从性。普通最小二乘(OLS),固定效应(FE)和随机效应(RE)模型用于估计共付额和MPR之间的关联。使用Logistic回归估计以共付额为条件的不遵守(MPR <0.80)的可能性。控制了患者的人口统计学,健康状况,先前的住院治疗以及药物使用的回归。结果:最高的β-受体阻滞剂共付水平(26美元以上)的平均MPR为0.07(95%CI,-0.11至-0.03),0.08(95%CI,-0.12至-0.04)和0.09(95的百分比CI,分别比OLS,RE和FE模型中的β受体阻滞剂共付水平(0美元对1美元)低-0.17至-0.02)单位。共付额水平21美元至25美元和26美元以上与药物不依从风险增加显着相关(OR分别为1.64; 95%CI,1.1-2.4; OR = 2.5; 95%,CI 1.6-4)。结论:年龄大于/ = 50岁的商业保险心力衰竭患者,开出了更高成本的β受体阻滞剂,可能平均每年最多减少9%的β受体阻滞剂用药量,并且出现不依从的风险增加(MPR <0.80) 。考虑到由于选择性处方而产生的选择偏见,结果应谨慎解释。鉴于不遵守β受体阻滞剂的不良健康后果,需要进一步探讨共付额水平和不遵守情况之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号