...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Survey on the prevalence of hemolytic specimens in an academic hospital according to collection facility: opportunities for quality improvement.
【24h】

Survey on the prevalence of hemolytic specimens in an academic hospital according to collection facility: opportunities for quality improvement.

机译:根据收集设施对一所学术医院的溶血标本进行调查:提高质量的机会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Laboratory test results are useful only when a high degree of quality is ensured throughout the total testing process (1). Although errors can occur at each step, preanalytical variables are recognized as the predominant source of mistakes (1, 2). Among the various problems that occur in the preanalytical phase, in vitro hemolysis is often reported as the leading source of error because many test results (e.g., potassium, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, coagulation testing) can be unreliable if hemolyzed samples are used (3-5). The most promising approach for dealing with hemolysis in patient samples is based on process monitoring, education and prevention (1, 2). Regardless of whatever strategy is implemented, effectiveness can only be achieved once the process has been extensively investigated, identifying the areas and activities that comprise the greatest risk (1, 2).
机译:实验室测试结果仅在整个测试过程中确保高质量时才有用(1)。尽管每个步骤都可能发生错误,但分析前变量被认为是错误的主要来源(1、2)。在分析前阶段发生的各种问题中,经常报道体外溶血是错误的主要来源,因为如果使用溶血样品,许多测试结果(例如,钾,乳酸脱氢酶,天冬氨酸转氨酶,凝血测试)可能不可靠( 3-5)。处理患者样品中溶血的最有前途的方法是基于过程监控,教育和预防(1、2)。无论采用何种策略,只有对流程进行了广泛的调查,确定了构成最大风险的领域和活动后,才能实现有效性(1、2)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号